JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (May 21, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.01248.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/2/657    most recent
01248.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lorincz, E. N
Right arrow Articles by Hess, B. J.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lorincz, E. N
Right arrow Articles by Hess, B. J.M.
Submitted on November 12, 2007
Accepted on May 19, 2008

Dynamic effects on the subjective visual vertical after roll rotation

Erika N Lorincz1 and Bernhard J.M. Hess1*

1 Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, ZH, Switzerland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bhess{at}neurol.uzh.ch.

We investigated in normal human subjects how semicircular canal and otolith signals interact in the estimation of the subjective visual vertical after constant velocity or constant acceleration roll tilt. In the constant velocity paradigm, subjects were rotated in darkness at ±60°/s for 5 complete cycles before being stopped in one of 7 orientations ranging from 0 to ±90° (right/left ear down). In the constant acceleration paradigm, the subjects were rotated with an acceleration of +30°/s2 or -30°/s2 to the same 7 end positions between -90° and +90°, by way of passing once through the upside down position. The subjective visual vertical was assessed by measuring the setting of a luminous line that appeared at different test delays after stop rotation in otherwise complete darkness. The data suggest that gravitational jerk signals generated by otolith-semicircular canal interactions and/or carried by phasic otolith signals are responsible for the observed transient bias in the estimation of the subjective visual vertical. This transient bias depended on both, rotation and tilt direction after constant velocity rotations, but was almost abolished following constant acceleration rotations.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. A. Vingerhoets, M. De Vrijer, J. A. M. Van Gisbergen, and W. P. Medendorp
Fusion of Visual and Vestibular Tilt Cues in the Perception of Visual Vertical
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2009; 101(3): 1321 - 1333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.