JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (March 31, 2004). doi:10.1152/jn.01272.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/3/1464    most recent
01272.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, M.
Right arrow Articles by Alloway, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, M.
Right arrow Articles by Alloway, K. D.
Submitted on December 30, 2003
Accepted on March 24, 2004

Stimulus-Induced Intercolumnar Synchronization of Neuronal Activity in Rat Barrel Cortex: A Laminar Analysis

Mengliang Zhang and Kevin D. Alloway*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kda1{at}psu.edu.

We used cross-correlation analysis to characterize the coordination of stimulus-induced neuronal activity in the SI barrel cortex of isoflurane-anesthetized rats. On each trial, multiple whiskers were simultaneously deflected at frequencies that corresponded to 2, 5, 8, or 11 Hz. Among 476 neuron pairs that we examined, 342 (71.8%) displayed significant peaks of synchronized activity that exceeded the 99.9% confidence limits. The incidence and strength of these functional associations varied across different cortical layers. Only 52.9% of neuron pairs in layer IV displayed synchronized responses, whereas 84.1% of the infragranular neuron pairs were synchronized during whisker stimulation. Neuronal synchronization was strongest in the infragranular layers, weakest in layer IV, and varied according to the columnar configuration of the neuron pairs. Thus, correlation coefficients were largest for neuron pairs in the same whisker barrel row but were smallest for neurons in different rows and arcs. Spontaneous activity in the infragranular layers was also synchronized to a greater degree than in the other layers. While infragranular neuron pairs displayed similar amounts of synchronization in response to each stimulus frequency, granular and supragranular neurons were synchronized mainly during stimulation at 2 or 5 Hz. These results are consistent with previous studies indicating that infragranular neurons have intrinsic properties that facilitate synchronized activity, and they suggest that neuronal synchronization plays an important role in transmitting sensory information to other cortical or subcortical brain regions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Percept PsychophysHome page
M. J. WENGER, A. M. COPELAND, J. L. BITTNER, and R. D. THOMAS
Evidence for criterion shifts in visual perceptual learning: Data and implications
Percept Psychophys, October 1, 2008; 70(7): 1248 - 1273.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Chakrabarti, M. Zhang, and K. D. Alloway
MI Neuronal Responses to Peripheral Whisker Stimulation: Relationship to Neuronal Activity in SI Barrels and Septa
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 50 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the The American Physiological Society.