JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (January 25, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.01287.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/4/2617    most recent
01287.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Szabo, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Preuss, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Szabo, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Preuss, T.
Submitted on December 7, 2005
Accepted on January 18, 2006

Representation of auditory signals in the M-cell:role of electrical synapses

Theresa M. Szabo1*, Shennan A. Weiss1, Donald S. Faber1, and Thomas Preuss1

1 Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tpreuss{at}aecom.yu.edu.

The teleost Mauthner (M-) cell mediates a sound-evoked escape behavior. A major component of the auditory input is transmitted via large myelinated club endings of the posterior VIIIth nerve. Paradoxically, although nerve stimulations revealed these afferents have mixed electrical and glutamatergic synapses on the M-cell's distal lateral dendrite, paired pre- and postsynaptic recordings indicated most individual connections are chemically silent. To determine the sensory information encoded and the relative contributions of these two transmission modes, M-cell responses to acoustic stimuli in air were recorded intracellularly. EPSPs evoked by both short 100 to 900 Hz 'pips' and longer-lasting amplitude- and frequency-modulated sounds were dominated by fast, repetitive EPSPs superimposed upon an underlying slow depolarization. Fast EPSPs 1) have kinetics comparable to presynaptic action potentials, 2) are maximal on the distal lateral dendrite, and 3) are insensitive to GluR antagonists. They presumably are coupling potentials, and power spectral analysis indicated they constitute a high-pass signal that accurately tracks sound frequency and amplitude. The slow EPSPs spatial profile suggests both proximal and distal dendritic sources, a result supported by predictions of a multi-compartmental model and the effects of AMPAR antagonists, which preferentially reduced the proximal component. Thus, a second class of afferents generates a portion of the slow EPSP which, with sound stimuli, demonstrate that the dominant mode of transmission at LMCE synapses is electrical. The slow EPSP is a dynamic, low-pass representation of stimulus strength. Accordingly, amplitude and phase information, which are segregated in other systems, are faithfully represented in the M-cell.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. Neumeister, T. M. Szabo, and T. Preuss
Behavioral and Physiological Characterization of Sensorimotor Gating in the Goldfish Startle Response
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1493 - 1502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. A. Weiss, S. J. Zottoli, S. C. Do, D. S. Faber, and T. Preuss
Correlation of C-start behaviors with neural activity recorded from the hindbrain in free-swimming goldfish (Carassius auratus)
J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2006; 209(23): 4788 - 4801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.