JN AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 14, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.01288.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/3/1658    most recent
01288.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haslinger, R.
Right arrow Articles by Devor, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haslinger, R.
Right arrow Articles by Devor, A.
Submitted on December 7, 2005
Accepted on June 5, 2006

Analysis of LFP Phase Predicts Sensory Response of Barrel Cortex

Robert Haslinger1*, Istvan Ulbert2, Chris I. Moore3, Emery N Brown4, and Anna Devor5

1 Department of Radiology, Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States
2 Department of Radiology, Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States; Institute for Psychology of the Hungarial Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
3 Department of Radiology, Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States; Brain and Cognative Sciences, McGovern Institute for Brain Research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
4 Department of Radiology, Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States; Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Harvard MIT/Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
5 Department of Radiology, Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States; Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: robhh{at}nmr.mgh.harvard.edu.

Several previous studies have demonstrated the existence of "Up" and "Down" states, and have linked their magnitude (e.g, depolarization level) to the size of sensory evoked responses. Here, we investigated how the temporal dynamics of such states influence the sensory evoked response to vibrissa deflection. Under alpha chloralose anesthesia, barrel cortex exhibits strong quasi-periodic ~1Hz local field potential (LFP) oscillations generated by the synchronized fluctuation of large populations of neurons between depolarized (Up) and hyperpolarized (Down) states. Using a linear depth electrode array, we recorded the local field potential (LFP) and multi-unit activity (MUA) simultaneously across multiple layers of the barrel column and used the LFP to approximate the subthreshold Up-Down fluctuations. Our central finding is that the MUA response is a strong function of the LFP oscillation's phase. When only ongoing LFP magnitude was considered, the response was largest in the "Down" state, in agreement with previous studies. However, consideration of the LFP phase revealed that the MUA response varied smoothly as a function of LFP phase in a manner that was not monotonically dependent upon LFP magnitude. The LFP phase is therefore a better predictor of the MUA response than the LFP magnitude is. Our results suggest that in the presence of ongoing oscillations there can be a continuum of response properties and that each phase may, at times, need to be considered a distinct cortical state.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. Curto, S. Sakata, S. Marguet, V. Itskov, and K. D. Harris
A Simple Model of Cortical Dynamics Explains Variability and State Dependence of Sensory Responses in Urethane-Anesthetized Auditory Cortex
J. Neurosci., August 26, 2009; 29(34): 10600 - 10612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Ros, R. N. S. Sachdev, Y. Yu, N. Sestan, and D. A. McCormick
Neocortical Networks Entrain Neuronal Circuits in Cerebellar Cortex
J. Neurosci., August 19, 2009; 29(33): 10309 - 10320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
V. Khatri, R. M. Bruno, and D. J. Simons
Stimulus-Specific and Stimulus-Nonspecific Firing Synchrony and Its Modulation by Sensory Adaptation in the Whisker-to-Barrel Pathway
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2009; 101(5): 2328 - 2338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. Czanner, U. T. Eden, S. Wirth, M. Yanike, W. A. Suzuki, and E. N. Brown
Analysis of Between-Trial and Within-Trial Neural Spiking Dynamics
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2672 - 2693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. M. Jones, A. Fontanini, B. F. Sadacca, P. Miller, and D. B. Katz
Natural stimuli evoke dynamic sequences of states in sensory cortical ensembles
PNAS, November 20, 2007; 104(47): 18772 - 18777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Hasenstaub, R. N. S. Sachdev, and D. A. McCormick
State Changes Rapidly Modulate Cortical Neuronal Responsiveness
J. Neurosci., September 5, 2007; 27(36): 9607 - 9622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.