JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (February 8, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.01292.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/6/3698    most recent
01292.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaneko, C. R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Fuchs, A. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaneko, C. R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Fuchs, A. F.
Submitted on December 9, 2005
Accepted on January 31, 2006

EFFECT OF PHARMACOLOGICAL INACTIVATION OF NUCLEUS RETICULARIS TEGMENTI PONTIS ON SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENTS IN THE MONKEY

Chris R. S. Kaneko1 and Albert F. Fuchs1*

1 Department of Physiology and Biophysics, U. Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Washington National Primate Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fuchs{at}u.washngton.edu.

Kaneko, C.R.S and Fuchs, A. F. Effect of pharmacological inactivation of the nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis on saccadic eye movements in the monkey. J. Neurophysiol. XX: yyy-zzz, 2006. The superior colliculus (SC) provides signals for the generation of saccades via a direct pathway to the brainstem burst generator (BG). In addition, it sends saccade-related activity to the BG indirectly through the cerebellum via a relay in the nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis (NRTP). Lesions of the oculomotor vermis, lobules VIc and VII, and inactivation of the caudal fastigial nucleus, the cerebellar output nucleus to which it projects, produce saccade dysmetria but have little effect on saccade peak velocity and duration. We expected similar deficits from inactivation of the NRTP. Instead, injections as small as 80 nL into the NRTP first slowed ipsiversive saccades and then gradually reduced their amplitudes. Post-injection saccades had slower peak velocities and longer durations than pre-injection saccades with similar amplitudes. Contraversive saccades retained their normal kinematics. When the gains of ipsiversive saccades to 10° target steps had fallen to their lowest values (0.28±0.19; n=10), the gains of contraversive saccades to 10° target steps had decreased very little (0.82 ± 0.11). Eventually, ipsiversive saccades did not exceed 5°, even to 20° target steps. Moreover, these small remaining saccades apparently were made with considerable difficulty, because their latencies increased substantially. When ipsiversive saccade gain was at its lowest, the gain and kinematics of vertical saccades to 10° target steps exhibited inconsistent changes. We argue that our injections did not compromise the direct SC pathway. Therefore, these data suggest that the cerebellar saccade pathway does not simply modulate BG activity but is required for horizontal saccades to occur at all.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.