JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (February 21, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.01301.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/4/3046    most recent
01301.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Proekt, A.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Proekt, A.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, K.
Submitted on December 12, 2006
Accepted on February 12, 2007

Multiple Contributions of an Input-Representing Neuron to the Dynamics of the Aplysia Feeding Network

Alex Proekt1, Jian Jing2, and Klaudiusz Weiss2*

1 Anesthesiology, Cornell University Medical College, New York, New York, United States
2 Neuroscience, Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: klaudiusz.weiss{at}mssm.edu.

In Aplysia, mutually antagonistic ingestive and egestive behaviors are produced by the same multifunctional central pattern generator (CPG) circuit. Interestingly, higher-order inputs that activate the CPG do not directly specify whether the resulting motor program is ingestive or egestive, because the slow dynamics of the network intervene. One input, the command-like cerebral-buccal interneuron 2 (CBI-2), slowly drives the motor output towards ingestion. While another input, the esophageal nerve (EN), drives the motor output towards egestion. When the input is switched from EN to CBI-2, the motor output does not switch immediately, and remains egestive. Here, we investigated how these slow dynamics are implemented on the interneuronal level. We found that activity of two CPG interneurons, B20 and B40, tracked the motor output regardless of the input, while activity of another CPG interneuron, B65, tracked the input regardless of the motor output. Furthermore, we show that the slow dynamics of the network are implemented, at least in part, in the slow dynamics of the interaction between the input-representing and the output-representing neurons. We conclude that 1) a population of CPG interneurons, recruited during a particular motor program, simultaneously encodes both the input that is used to elicit the motor program, and the output elicited by this input; and, 2) activity of the input-representing neurons may serve to bias the future motor programs.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. Sasaki, J. Jing, M. R. Due, and K. R. Weiss
An Input-Representing Interneuron Regulates Spike Timing and Thereby Phase Switching in a Motor Network
J. Neurosci., February 20, 2008; 28(8): 1916 - 1928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Hurwitz, A. Ophir, A. Korngreen, J. Koester, and A. J. Susswein
Currents Contributing to Decision Making in Neurons B31/B32 of Aplysia
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 814 - 830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J.-s. Wu, M. R. Due, K. Sasaki, A. Proekt, J. Jing, and K. R. Weiss
State Dependence of Spike Timing and Neuronal Function in a Motor Pattern Generating Network
J. Neurosci., October 3, 2007; 27(40): 10818 - 10831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.