|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany
2 Goettingen, Germany; Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany
3 Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
4 University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany; Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mnitsch1{at}gwdg.de.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces stimulation polarity-dependent neuroplastic excitability shifts in the human brain. Because it accomplishes long-lasting effects and its application is simple, it is used increasingly. However, one drawback is its low focality, caused by (a) the large stimulation electrode and (b) the functionally effective reference electrode, which is also situated on the scalp. We aimed to increase focality of tDCS. This might improve the interpretation of the functional effects of stimulation, because it will restrict its effects to more clearly defined cortical areas. Moreover, it will avoid unwanted reversed effects of tDCS under the reference electrode, which is of special importance in clinical settings, when a homogenous shift of cortical excitability is needed. Since current density (current strength/ electrode size) determines the efficacy of tDCS, increased focality should be accomplished by (a) reducing stimulation electrode size, but keeping current density constant or (b) increasing reference electrode size under constant current strength. We tested these hypotheses for motor cortex tDCS. The results show that reducing the size of the motor cortex DC-stimulation electrode focalised the respective tDCS-induced excitability changes. Increasing the size of the frontopolar reference electrode rendered stimulation over this cortex functionally inefficient, but did not compromise the tDCS-generated motor cortical excitability shifts. Thus tDCS-generated modulations of cortical excitability can be focussed by reducing the size of the stimulation electrode and by increasing the size of the reference electrode. For future applications of tDCS, such paradigms may help to achieve more selective tDCS effects.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Knoch, M. A. Nitsche, U. Fischbacher, C. Eisenegger, A. Pascual-Leone, and E. Fehr Studying the Neurobiology of Social Interaction with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation--The Example of Punishing Unfairness Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2008; 18(9): 1987 - 1990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Fecteau, D. Knoch, F. Fregni, N. Sultani, P. Boggio, and A. Pascual-Leone Diminishing Risk-Taking Behavior by Modulating Activity in the Prefrontal Cortex: A Direct Current Stimulation Study J. Neurosci., November 14, 2007; 27(46): 12500 - 12505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Fecteau, A. Pascual-Leone, D. H. Zald, P. Liguori, H. Theoret, P. S. Boggio, and F. Fregni Activation of Prefrontal Cortex by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Reduces Appetite for Risk during Ambiguous Decision Making J. Neurosci., June 6, 2007; 27(23): 6212 - 6218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |