JN AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (August 16, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.01321.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/5/2775    most recent
01321.2004v2
01321.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ziburkus, J.
Right arrow Articles by Guido, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ziburkus, J.
Right arrow Articles by Guido, W.
Submitted on December 21, 2004
Accepted on August 1, 2006

Loss of binocular responses and reduced retinal convergence during the period of retinogeniculate axon segregation

Jokubas Ziburkus1 and William Guido1*

1 Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State Health Science Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wguido{at}lsuhsc.edu.

In the developing mammalian visual system, axon terminals from the two eyes overlap in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) but then undergo a period of refinement and segregate to form distinct eye specific domains. We report on the changes in synaptic transmission that occur in rodent LGN during the period of retinogeniculate axon segregation by utilizing anterograde labeling techniques in conjunction with an in vitro preparation where large segments of each optic nerve are preserved. Anterograde labeling of retinal projections in early postnatal day (P) rats with cholera toxin {beta} subunit indicated an age related recession in uncrossed retinal projections. Between P2-5 uncrossed projections occupied as much as 50% of the LGN and overlapped substantially with crossed projections. Between the first and second postnatal week uncrossed projections receded, so by P14 they assumed an adult-like profile occupying 15-20% of LGN, and showed little or no overlap with crossed projections. The postsynaptic responses of LGN cells evoked by the separate stimulation of each optic nerve indicated that before P14, many relay cells were binocularly innervated and received up to 4-6 inputs from each eye. However, these features of retinogeniculate connectivity were transient and their attrition occurred in concert with a retraction of retinal arbors into non-overlapping, eye specific regions. By P18 cells were monocularly innervated and received input from 1-3 retinal ganglion cells. These results provide a better understanding of the underlying changes in synaptic circuitry that occur during the anatomical segregation of retinal inputs into eye specific territories.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
W. Guido
Refinement of the retinogeniculate pathway
J. Physiol., September 15, 2008; 586(18): 4357 - 4362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
B. M. Hooks and C. Chen
Vision Triggers an Experience-Dependent Sensitive Period at the Retinogeniculate Synapse
J. Neurosci., April 30, 2008; 28(18): 4807 - 4817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
X. Liu and C. Chen
Different Roles for AMPA and NMDA Receptors in Transmission at the Immature Retinogeniculate Synapse
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 629 - 643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.