JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (January 30, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.01322.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/2/681    most recent
01322.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masri, R.
Right arrow Articles by Keller, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Masri, R.
Right arrow Articles by Keller, A.
Submitted on December 7, 2007
Accepted on January 29, 2008

Encoding of Stimulus Frequency and Sensor Motion in the Posterior Medial Thalamic Nucleus

Radi Masri1, Tatiana Bezdudnaya1, Jason C Trageser2, and Asaf Keller1*

1 Anatomy and Neurobiology & Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
2 National Eye Institute, National Institute of Health, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: akeller{at}umaryland.edu.

In all sensory systems, information is processed along several parallel streams. In the vibrissa-to-barrel cortex system, these include the lemniscal system, and the lesser-known paralemniscal system. The posterior medial nucleus (POm) is the thalamic structure associated with the latter pathway. Previous studies suggested that POm response latencies are positively correlated with stimulation frequency, and negatively correlated with response duration, providing a basis for a phase locked loop-temporal decoding of stimulus frequency (Ahissar et al. 2000). We tested this hypothesis by analyzing response latencies of POm neurons, in both awake and anesthetized rats, to vibrissae deflections at frequencies between 0.3 to 11 Hz. We found no significant, systematic correlation between stimulation frequency and the latency or duration of POm responses. We obtained similar findings from recording in awake rats, in rats under different anesthetics, and in anesthetized rats in which the reticular activating system was stimulated. These findings suggest that stimulus frequency is not reliably reflected in response latency of POm neurons. We also tested the hypothesis that POm neurons respond preferentially to sensor motion, that is, they respond to whisking in air, without contacts (Yu et al. 2006). We recorded from awake, head-restrained rats, while monitoring vibrissae movements. All POm neurons responded to passive whisker deflections, but none responded to non-contact whisking. Thus, like their counterparts in the trigeminal ganglion, POm neurons may not reliably encode whisking kinematics. These observations suggest that POm neurons might not faithfully encode vibrissae inputs to provide reliable information on vibrissae movements or contacts.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. P. J. de Kock and B. Sakmann
Spiking in primary somatosensory cortex during natural whisking in awake head-restrained rats is cell-type specific
PNAS, September 22, 2009; 106(38): 16446 - 16450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Chakrabarti and K. D. Alloway
Differential Response Patterns in the SI Barrel and Septal Compartments During Mechanical Whisker Stimulation
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1632 - 1646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Masri, R. L. Quiton, J. M. Lucas, P. D. Murray, S. M. Thompson, and A. Keller
Zona Incerta: A Role in Central Pain
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2009; 102(1): 181 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
V. Khatri, R. Bermejo, J. C. Brumberg, A. Keller, and H. P. Zeigler
Whisking in Air: Encoding of Kinematics by Trigeminal Ganglion Neurons in Awake Rats
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2009; 101(4): 1836 - 1846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
T. Furuta, T. Kaneko, and M. Deschenes
Septal Neurons in Barrel Cortex Derive Their Receptive Field Input from the Lemniscal Pathway
J. Neurosci., April 1, 2009; 29(13): 4089 - 4095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. Ahissar, D. Golomb, S. Haidarliu, R. Sosnik, and C. Yu
Latency Coding in POm: Importance of Parametric Regimes
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 1152 - 1154.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Masri, T. Bezdudnaya, J. C. Trageser, and A. Keller
Reply to Ahissar et al.
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 1155 - 1157.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Chakrabarti, M. Zhang, and K. D. Alloway
MI Neuronal Responses to Peripheral Whisker Stimulation: Relationship to Neuronal Activity in SI Barrels and Septa
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 50 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.