JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (May 18, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.01328.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/4/2391    most recent
01328.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ramat, S.
Right arrow Articles by Zee, D. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ramat, S.
Right arrow Articles by Zee, D. S
Submitted on December 22, 2004
Accepted on May 13, 2005

The interaural translational VOR: suppression, enhancement and cognitive control

Stefano Ramat1*, Dominik Straumann2, and David S Zee3

1 Dep. of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Dep. of Systems and Computer Science, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
2 Dep. of Neurology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
3 Dep. of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: steram{at}linus2.unipv.it.

We investigated the influence of cognitive factors on the early response of the interaural translational vestibulo-ocular reflex (tVOR) in six normal subjects. Variables were 1) prior knowledge of direction of head motion and 2) the position of the fixation target relative to the head (head-fixed (HF) or space-fixed (SF)). A manually-driven device provided a step-like head translation (~35 mm distance, peak acceleration, 0.6-1.3 g). Subjects looked at the SF or HF target, located 15 cm in front of their heads in otherwise complete darkness. The testing paradigms were: random interleaving of SF and HF targets with unknown direction of head movement, known target location with random head direction (SFR or HFR), and known target location with known head direction (SFP or HFP). Timing was always unpredictable. A gain of the slow phase was calculated with respect to ideal performance (maintained fixation of the SF target, recorded / ideal eye velocity computed at time of peak head velocity). At such times, there were no significant differences in gain between HF and SF trials in the random condition; the average gain was ~36% of ideal. On the other hand, responses in the SFR and HFR conditions differed as early as 20 ms after the head began moving. Average gain was higher (0.43±0.11 vs. 0.34±0.14, P<0.05) for each subject in the SFR than the HFR condition. For SFP and HFP, the responses differed from the onset of head motion. Average slow-phase gain was higher (0.49±0.12 vs.0.31±0.12, P<0.02) for each subject in SFP than in HFP. The timing of corrective saccades during the tVOR was also influenced by cognitive factors. Visual error signals seemed to be more important for triggering saccades in HF trials while preprogramming, probably based on labyrinthine information seemed to be more important in SF trials. Simulations showed that the changes in slow-phase gain with cognition could be reproduced with simple parametric adjustments of the gain of activity from otolith afferents, and suggest that higher-level cognitive control of the VOR could occur as early as the synapse of peripheral afferents upon neurons in the vestibular nuclei, either directly from higher level centers, or via the cerebellum. In sum, the tVOR - both in its slow-phase response and the saccadic corrections - is subject to higher-level cognitive influences including knowledge of where the line of sight must point during head motion and the impending direction of head motion.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. Schlenker, G. Mirabella, H. C. Goltz, P. Kessler, A. W. Blakeman, and A. M. F. Wong
The Linear Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex in Patients with Skew Deviation
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2009; 50(1): 168 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.