JN Miami Valley Hospital
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (September 14, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.01329.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/1/284    most recent
01329.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Born, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Yi, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Born, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Yi, S.
Submitted on December 22, 2004
Accepted on September 6, 2005

Temporal Evolution of 2-Dimensional Direction Signals Used to Guide Eye Movements

Richard T. Born*, Christopher C. Pack, Carlos R. Ponce, and Si Yi

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rborn{at}hms.harvard.edu.

The smooth pursuit system must integrate many local motion measurements into a coherent estimate of target velocity. Several laboratories have studied this integration process using eye movements elicited by targets, such as tilted bars, containing conflicts between local motion signals measured along contours (1D) and those measured at the bar's end-points, or terminators (2D). The general finding is that 1D signals dominate early responses, whereas later components of the behavior are determined by 2D signals. We studied the dynamics of the integration process in macaque monkeys by systematically varying the relative proportions of 1D and 2D signals and the retinal eccentricities at which they appeared. Predictably, longer bars produced greater and longer-lasting contour-induced deviations. The evolution of the 2D response occurred over a period of 50-400 ms, depending on the relative proportions of 1D and 2D signals. As contours were displaced from the fovea the deviation decreased, but much less so for early (1st 40 ms) than for late (subsequent 40 ms) pursuit initiation. These bottom-up effects could be overcome to a limited extent by the top-down influence of predictability. Finally, we observed that when animals were free to track any part of the bar, they spontaneously made short-latency saccades to the terminators on most trials, especially when the bars were tilted. This suggests an increased saliency of moving terminators, particularly when discrepancies exist among local motion signals.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. I. Braun, N. Mennie, C. Rasche, A. C. Schutz, M. J. Hawken, and K. R. Gegenfurtner
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements to Isoluminant Targets
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1287 - 1300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
G. A. Orban
Higher Order Visual Processing in Macaque Extrastriate Cortex
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 59 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Montagnini, M. Spering, and G. S. Masson
Predicting 2D Target Velocity Cannot Help 2D Motion Integration for Smooth Pursuit Initiation
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 3545 - 3550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.