JN Miami Valley Hospital
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 27, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.01342.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/4/2285    most recent
01342.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thiel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kretzberg, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thiel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kretzberg, J.
Submitted on December 20, 2006
Accepted on June 25, 2007

Contribution of individual retinal ganglion cell responses to velocity and acceleration encoding

Andreas Thiel1*, Martin Greschner2, Christian W Eurich3, Josef Ammermueller1, and Jutta Kretzberg1

1 Department of Biology, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
2 Department of Biology, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany; Systems Neuroscience Lab E, The Salk Institute, La Jolla, California, United States
3 Theoretical Neurophysics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: andreas.thiel{at}uni-oldenburg.de.

We investigate the capability of turtle retinal ganglion cell (RGC) ensembles to simultaneously encode multiple aspects of visual motion, namely speed, direction, and acceleration of moving patterns. Bayesian stimulus reconstruction reveals that the instantaneous firing rates of RGCs contain information about all of these stimulus properties. Stimulus velocity is mainly encoded by steady-state firing rates, while acceleration can be reconstructed from transient components in RGC activity induced by abrupt velocity changes. Therefore, neurons in higher brain areas may in principle extract information about changing velocity from the instantaneous firing activity of RGCs, without the need to compare responses to present velocities to previous ones. However, reconstruction requires the estimation of a combined acceleration and velocity signal, indicating that RGC ensembles signal both properties simultaneously. In accordance with this conclusion, combined velocity/acceleration sensitivity enhances the similarity of artificial spike trains to experimental data by 50% compared to the case of pure velocity tuning. Decoding of motion direction in addition to speed and acceleration requires direction sensitive cells, which generate higher firing rates for one of the motion directions and therefore show asymmetric velocity tuning. By dividing the entire ensemble of simultaneously recorded cells into one group of direction-sensitive cells and one group with symmetric tuning, we demonstrate that the population of these direction-sensitive cells encodes a combination of motion speed, acceleration and direction. However, estimation of velocity and acceleration is improved by including the larger group of RGC responses that are sensitive to speed but not to motion direction.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. van Duuren, J. Lankelma, and C. M. A. Pennartz
Population Coding of Reward Magnitude in the Orbitofrontal Cortex of the Rat
J. Neurosci., August 20, 2008; 28(34): 8590 - 8603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.