JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 100: 829-838, 2008. First published June 11, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.00030.2008
0022-3077/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/2/829    most recent
00030.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sestieri, C.
Right arrow Articles by Corbetta, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sestieri, C.
Right arrow Articles by Corbetta, M.

Independence of Anticipatory Signals for Spatial Attention From Number of Nontarget Stimuli in the Visual Field

C. Sestieri1,2,3, C. M. Sylvester4, A. I. Jack3, G. d'Avossa3, G. L. Shulman3 and M. Corbetta1,2,3,4,5

1Department of Clinical Sciences and Bioimaging, G. d'Annunzio University and 2Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, G. d'Annunzio University Foundation, Chieti, Italy; and 3Department of Neurology, 4Department of Radiology, and 5Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

Submitted 9 January 2008; accepted in final form 3 June 2008

Covertly attending to a location modulates the activity of visual areas even in the absence of visual stimulation. These effects are widespread, being found in the cortical representations of both attended and unattended portions of the visual field. It is not clear, however, whether preparatory modulations depend on subjects' expectation regarding the presence of additional nontarget stimuli in the visual field. Here, we asked subjects to endogenously direct attention to a peripheral location in the upper visual field, to identify the orientation of a low-contrast target stimulus, and we manipulated the number and behavioral relevance of other low-contrast nontarget stimuli in the visual field. Anticipatory (i.e., prestimulus) blood oxygenation level–dependent (BOLD) signal increments in visual cortex were strongest at the contralateral attended location, whereas signal decrements were strongest at the unattended mirror-opposite ipsilateral location/region of visual cortex. Importantly, these strong anticipatory decrements were not related to the presence/absence of nontarget low-contrast stimuli and did not correlate with either weaker target-evoked responses or worse performance. Second, the presence of other low-contrast stimuli in the visual field, even when potential targets, did not modify the anticipatory signal modulation either at target or nontarget locations. We conclude that the topography of spatial attention–related anticipatory BOLD signal modulation across visual cortex, specifically decrements at unattended locations, is mainly determined by processes at the cued location and not by the number or behavioral relevance of distant low-contrast nontarget stimuli elsewhere in the visual field.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. Corbetta, Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, P.O. Box 8111, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110 (E-mail: mau{at}npg.wustl.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. M. Lewis, A. Baldassarre, G. Committeri, G. L. Romani, and M. Corbetta
From the Cover: Learning sculpts the spontaneous activity of the resting human brain
PNAS, October 13, 2009; 106(41): 17558 - 17563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. M. Sylvester, G. L. Shulman, A. I. Jack, and M. Corbetta
Anticipatory and Stimulus-Evoked Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent Modulations Related to Spatial Attention Reflect a Common Additive Signal
J. Neurosci., August 26, 2009; 29(34): 10671 - 10682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
N. A. Busch, J. Dubois, and R. VanRullen
The Phase of Ongoing EEG Oscillations Predicts Visual Perception
J. Neurosci., June 17, 2009; 29(24): 7869 - 7876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Capotosto, C. Babiloni, G. L. Romani, and M. Corbetta
Frontoparietal Cortex Controls Spatial Attention through Modulation of Anticipatory Alpha Rhythms
J. Neurosci., May 6, 2009; 29(18): 5863 - 5872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.