HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 100/3/1384    most recent 90340.2008v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ji, W. Articles by Suga, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ji, W. Articles by Suga, N.

Tone-Specific and Nonspecific Plasticity of the Auditory Cortex Elicited by Pseudoconditioning: Role of Acetylcholine Receptors and the Somatosensory Cortex

Department of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri

Submitted 7 March 2008; accepted in final form 1 July 2008

Experience-dependent plastic changes in the central sensory systems are due to activation of both the sensory and neuromodulatory systems. Nonspecific changes of cortical auditory neurons elicited by pseudoconditioning are quite different from tone-specific changes of the neurons elicited by auditory fear conditioning. Therefore the neural circuit evoking the nonspecific changes must also be different from that evoking the tone-specific changes. We first examined changes in the response properties of cortical auditory neurons of the big brown bat elicited by pseudoconditioning with unpaired tonal (CS_u) and electric leg (US_u) stimuli and found that it elicited nonspecific changes to CS_u (a heart-rate decrease, an auditory response increase, a broadening of frequency tuning, and a decrease in threshold) and, in addition, a small tone-specific change to CS_u (a small short-lasting best-frequency shift) only when CS_u frequency was 5 kHz lower than the best frequency of a recorded neuron. We then examined the effects of drugs on the cortical changes elicited by the pseudoconditioning. The development of the nonspecific changes was scarcely affected by atropine (a muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonist) and mecamylamine (a nicotinic cholinergic receptor antagonist) applied to the auditory cortex and by muscimol (a GABA_A-receptor agonist) applied to the somatosensory cortex. However, these drugs abolished the small short-lasting tone-specific change as they abolished the large long-lasting tone-specific change elicited by auditory fear conditioning. Our current results indicate that, different from the tone-specific change, the nonspecific changes depend on neither the cholinergic neuromodulator nor the somatosensory cortex.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Ji and N. Suga Tone-Specific and Nonspecific Plasticity of Inferior Colliculus Elicited by Pseudo-Conditioning: Role of Acetylcholine and Auditory and Somatosensory Cortices J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 941 - 952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Ma and N. Suga Specific and Nonspecific Plasticity of the Primary Auditory Cortex Elicited by Thalamic Auditory Neurons J. Neurosci., April 15, 2009; 29(15): 4888 - 4896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]