HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Figures and Tables All Versions of this Article: 100/4/1983    most recent 90635.2008v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bartley, A. F. Articles by Gibson, J. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bartley, A. F. Articles by Gibson, J. R.

Differential Activity-Dependent, Homeostatic Plasticity of Two Neocortical Inhibitory Circuits

¹University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Neuroscience, Dallas, Texas; and ²Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York

Submitted 3 June 2008; accepted in final form 7 August 2008

Chronic changes in neuronal activity homeostatically regulate excitatory circuitry. However, little is known about how activity regulates inhibitory circuits or specific inhibitory neuron types. Here, we examined the activity-dependent regulation of two neocortical inhibitory circuits—parvalbumin-positive (Parv+) and somatostatin-positive (Som+)—using paired recordings of synaptically coupled neurons. Action potentials were blocked for 5 days in slice culture, and unitary synaptic connections among inhibitory/excitatory neuron pairs were examined. Chronic activity blockade caused similar and distinct changes between the two inhibitory circuits. First, increases in intrinsic membrane excitability and excitatory synaptic drive in both inhibitory subtypes were consistent with the homeostatic regulation of firing rate of these neurons. On the other hand, inhibitory synapses originating from these two subtypes were differentially regulated by activity blockade. Parv+ unitary inhibitory postsynaptic current (uIPSC) strength was decreased while Som+ uIPSC strength was unchanged. Using short-duration stimulus trains, short-term plasticity for both unitary excitatory postsynaptic current (uEPSCs) and uIPSCs was unchanged in Parv+ circuitry while distinctively altered in Som+ circuitry—uEPSCs became less facilitating and uIPSCs became more depressing. In the context of recurrent inhibition, these changes would result in a frequency-dependent shift in the relative influence of each circuit. The functional changes at both types of inhibitory connections appear to be mediated by increases in presynaptic release probability and decreases in synapse number. Interestingly, these opposing changes result in decreased Parv+-mediated uIPSCs but balance out to maintain normal Som+-mediated uIPSCs. In summary, these results reveal that inhibitory circuitry is not uniformly regulated by activity levels and may provide insight into the mechanisms of both normal and pathological neocortical plasticity.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. R. Gibson, K. M. Huber, and T. C. Sudhof Neuroligin-2 Deletion Selectively Decreases Inhibitory Synaptic Transmission Originating from Fast-Spiking but Not from Somatostatin-Positive Interneurons J. Neurosci., November 4, 2009; 29(44): 13883 - 13897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Li, U. Rudolph, and M. M. Huntsman Long-term sensory deprivation selectively rearranges functional inhibitory circuits in mouse barrel cortex PNAS, July 21, 2009; 106(29): 12156 - 12161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]