HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 100/4/2225    most recent 90532.2008v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Musselman, K. E. Articles by Yang, J. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Musselman, K. E. Articles by Yang, J. F.

Interlimb Coordination in Rhythmic Leg Movements: Spontaneous and Training-Induced Manifestations in Human Infants

¹Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine and ²Centre for Neuroscience, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Submitted 5 May 2008; accepted in final form 18 July 2008

Different rhythmic leg movements in vertebrates can share coordinating neural circuitry. These movements are often similar kinematically, and smooth transitions between the different movements are common. We focused on interlimb coordination of the legs in young infants to determine whether weight bearing and non–weight bearing movements might share coordinating circuitry. If interlimb coordination is controlled by the same circuitry, the same coordination (i.e., either synchronous or alternate) should be seen in different rhythmic movements. Moreover, if we altered the interlimb coordination in one movement through exercise, it should translate to a change in coordination in another rhythmic movement that received no exercise. Video and electrogoniometry were recorded while 46 infants (age, 6.2 ± 1.4 mo) performed non–weight bearing and weight bearing movements. Interlimb coordination was quantified by the phase lag between the movement cycles of each leg. Most infants (83%) showed the same coordination in weight bearing and non–weight bearing movements. Ten infants practiced the form of coordination they did not exhibit in the first visit, in weight bearing for 4 wk. Following practice, 8 of 10 infants changed their interlimb coordination in weight bearing to that practiced. Some who practiced synchronous coordination also changed their coordination in non–weight bearing activity. More infants showed both forms of coordination after practice and smooth transitions between the two forms. The results suggest that interlimb coordination is malleable in infants, and there is a partial sharing of the neural substrates for interlimb coordination between different rhythmic leg movements in infants.