|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, 2Departments of Neurology, 3Anatomy and Neurobiology, and 4Biomedical Engineering, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; 5Department of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University; Cambridge, Massachusetts; 6Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and 7Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland
Submitted 11 March 2008; accepted in final form 10 September 2008
Two functionally distinct, and potentially competing, brain networks have been recently identified that can be broadly distinguished by their contrasting roles in attention to the external world versus internally directed mentation involving long-term memory. At the core of these two networks are the dorsal attention system and the hippocampal-cortical memory system, a component of the brain's default network. Here spontaneous blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) signal correlations were used in three separate functional magnetic resonance imaging data sets (n = 105) to define a third system, the frontoparietal control system, which is spatially interposed between these two previously defined systems. The frontoparietal control system includes many regions identified as supporting cognitive control and decision-making processes including lateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and inferior parietal lobule. Detailed analysis of frontal and parietal cortex, including use of high-resolution data, revealed clear evidence for contiguous but distinct regions: in general, the regions associated with the frontoparietal control system are situated between components of the dorsal attention and hippocampal-cortical memory systems. The frontoparietal control system is therefore anatomically positioned to integrate information from these two opposing brain systems.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. S. Margulies, J. L. Vincent, C. Kelly, G. Lohmann, L. Q. Uddin, B. B. Biswal, A. Villringer, F. X. Castellanos, M. P. Milham, and M. Petrides Precuneus shares intrinsic functional architecture in humans and monkeys PNAS, November 24, 2009; 106(47): 20069 - 20074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. Krienen and R. L. Buckner Segregated Fronto-Cerebellar Circuits Revealed by Intrinsic Functional Connectivity Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2009; 19(10): 2485 - 2497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Weaver and A. G. Richardson Medial Prefrontal Cortex, Secondary Hyperalgesia, and the Default Mode Network J. Neurosci., September 16, 2009; 29(37): 11424 - 11425. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Fox, D. Zhang, A. Z. Snyder, and M. E. Raichle The Global Signal and Observed Anticorrelated Resting State Brain Networks J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2009; 101(6): 3270 - 3283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Hutchinson, M. R. Uncapher, and A. D. Wagner Posterior parietal cortex and episodic retrieval: Convergent and divergent effects of attention and memory Learn. Mem., May 23, 2009; 16(6): 343 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Wig, R. L. Buckner, and D. L. Schacter Repetition Priming Influences Distinct Brain Systems: Evidence From Task-Evoked Data and Resting-State Correlations J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2009; 101(5): 2632 - 2648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Buckner, J. Sepulcre, T. Talukdar, F. M. Krienen, H. Liu, T. Hedden, J. R. Andrews-Hanna, R. A. Sperling, and K. A. Johnson Cortical Hubs Revealed by Intrinsic Functional Connectivity: Mapping, Assessment of Stability, and Relation to Alzheimer's Disease J. Neurosci., February 11, 2009; 29(6): 1860 - 1873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |