JN Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 102: 1193-1205, 2009. First published June 17, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.00121.2009
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/2/1193    most recent
00121.2009v2
00121.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feng, X.
Right arrow Articles by Ludlow, C. L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feng, X.
Right arrow Articles by Ludlow, C. L.

Effects of Dopamine D1 and D2 Receptor Antagonists on Laryngeal Neurophysiology in the Rat

Xin Feng1, Victor M. Henriquez1, Judith R. Walters2 and Christy L. Ludlow1

1 Laryngeal and Speech Section, Medical Neurology Branch, and 2 Neurophysiological Pharmacology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Submitted 9 February 2009; accepted in final form 13 June 2009

Hypophonia is an early symptom in Parkinson's disease (PD) that involves an increase in laryngeal muscle activity, interfering with voice production. Our aim was to use an animal model to better understand the role of different dopamine receptor subtypes in the control of laryngeal neurophysiology. First, we evaluated the combined effects of SCH23390—a D1 receptor antagonist with a D2 receptor antagonist (eticlopride) on laryngeal neurophysiology, and then tested the separate effects of selective receptor antagonists. Thyroarytenoid (TA) and gastrocnemius (GN) muscle activity was measured at rest and while stimulating the internal branch of superior laryngeal nerve to elicit the laryngeal adductor response (LAR) in alpha-chloralose–anesthetized rats. Paired stimuli at different interstimulus intervals between 250 and 5,000 ms measured central conditioning of the LAR. Changes in resting muscle activity, response latency, amplitude, and LAR conditioning after each drug were compared with the saline control. SCH23390 alone increased the resting TA muscle activity (P < 0.05). With the combined SCH23390 + eticlopride or SCH23390 alone, response latency decreased (P < 0.01), amplitude increased (P < 0.01), and the test LAR was reduced at 2,000-ms ISI (P < 0.01). No LAR changes occurred when eticlopride was administered alone at a low dose and only a tendency to suppress responses was found at a high dose. No changes in GN muscle activity occurred in any of the groups. The results suggest that a loss of stimulation of D1 receptors plays a significant role in laryngeal pathophysiology in PD.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: C. L. Ludlow, Laryngeal and Speech Section, Medical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Building10/Room5D38, Bethesda, MD 20892-1416 (E-mail: ludlowcx{at}jmu.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.