JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 102: 1623-1631, 2009. First published June 24, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.91295.2008
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/3/1623    most recent
91295.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Albanese, M.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, G. H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Albanese, M.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, G. H.

Differential Effects of Cognitive Demand on Human Cortical Activation Associated With Vibrotactile Stimulation

M.-C. Albanese1, E. G. Duerden3,4, V. Bohotin4, P. Rainville3,5 and G. H. Duncan2,3,5

1Department of Psychology and 2Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University; and 3Groupe de recherche sur le système nerveux central, 4Département de physiologie, and 5Département de stomatologie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Submitted 12 May 2008; accepted in final form 21 June 2009

Abstract

This event-related functional MRI study examines the neural correlates of vibrotactile sensation within the context of different psychophysical demands. Nine subjects received vibrotactile stimuli on the right volar forearm during detection, localization, and passive tasks. In the detection task, subjects indicated the offset (end) of each stimulus by pressing a response key with their left hand. In the localization task, subjects identified the location of the stimulus ("distal?" or "proximal?") by pressing the appropriate response key 4 s after the end of the stimulus. In the passive task, subjects received the same vibrotactile stimuli, but no response was required. Analysis of stimulus-evoked activity compared with the resting baseline period revealed significant bilateral secondary somatosensory cortex activation for all three tasks. However, only in the offset-detection and localization tasks was stimulus-evoked activation observed in other expected areas of tactile processing, such as contralateral primary somatosensory cortex neighboring the posterior parietal cortex (SI/PPC) and in bilateral anterior insular cortex (aIC). During the localization task, we identified vibrotactile-evoked activation in the right aIC, which was maintained after the termination of the stimulus. Results suggest that vibrotactile-related activation within SI/PPC and aIC is enhanced by the increased levels of attention and cognitive demands required by the detection and localization tasks. Activation of aIC not only during vibrotactile stimulation, but also during the poststimulus delay in the localization trials, is consistent with the growing literature linking this area with the perception and short-term memory of tactile information.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: G. Duncan, 2960 Ch. de la Tour, Room 4135, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1J4, Canada (E-mail: gary.duncan{at}umontreal.ca)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.