HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 102/3/1672    most recent 00419.2009v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Google Scholar Articles by Tang, Z.-Q. Articles by Lu, Y. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tang, Z.-Q. Articles by Lu, Y.

Control of a Depolarizing GABAergic Input in an Auditory Coincidence Detection Circuit

Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeastern Ohio Universities Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy, Rootstown, Ohio

Submitted 14 May 2009; accepted in final form 30 June 2009

Abstract

Neurons in the chicken nucleus laminaris (NL), the third-order auditory neurons that detect the interaural time differences that enable animals to localize sounds in the horizontal plane, receive glutamatergic excitation from the cochlear nucleus magnocellularis (NM) and GABAergic inhibition from the ipsilateral superior olivary nucleus. Here, we study metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR)- and GABA_B receptor (GABA_BR)-mediated modulation of synaptic transmission in NL neurons. Gramicidin-perforated recordings from acute brain stem slice preparations showed that the reversal potential of the GABAergic responses in NL neurons was more depolarized than the spike threshold. Activation of the GABAergic input produced a mix of inhibitory and excitatory actions in NL neurons. The inhibitory action is known to be critical in improving the acuity of temporal processing of sounds. The excitatory action, however, would reduce the phase locking fidelity of NL neurons in response to their excitatory inputs from the NM. We show that activation of presynaptic mGluRs or GABA_BRs by either exogenous agonists or synaptically released neurotransmitters reduced the GABAergic responses, preventing the excitatory action of GABA while leaving the inhibitory action intact. Unlike most CNS synapses, the glutamatergic transmission in the NL was not modulated by either mGluRs or GABA_BRs, indicating that fixed (nonmodulatory) excitatory inputs to the NL may be optimal for coincidence detection. This study contributes to our understanding of how selective neuromodulation is achieved to suit a particular function of neuronal circuits in the brain.