JN AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 102: 1763-1778, 2009. First published June 24, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.91154.2008
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/3/1763    most recent
91154.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gibb, L.
Right arrow Articles by Abarbanel, H. D. I.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gibb, L.
Right arrow Articles by Abarbanel, H. D. I.

Brain Stem Feedback in a Computational Model of Birdsong Sequencing

Leif Gibb1,6, Timothy Q. Gentner2 and Henry D. I. Abarbanel3,4,5,6

1Neurosciences Graduate Program, 2Department of Psychology, 3Department of Physics, 4Marine Physical Laboratory (Scripps Institution of Oceanography), 5Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, and 6Institute for Nonlinear Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California

Submitted 19 October 2008; accepted in final form 23 June 2009

Abstract

Uncovering the roles of neural feedback in the brain is an active area of experimental research. In songbirds, the telencephalic premotor nucleus HVC receives neural feedback from both forebrain and brain stem areas. Here we present a computational model of birdsong sequencing that incorporates HVC and associated nuclei and builds on the model of sparse bursting presented in our preceding companion paper. Our model embodies the hypotheses that 1) different networks in HVC control different syllables or notes of birdsong, 2) interneurons in HVC not only participate in sparse bursting but also provide mutual inhibition between networks controlling syllables or notes, and 3) these syllable networks are sequentially excited by neural feedback via the brain stem and the afferent thalamic nucleus Uva, or a similar feedback pathway. We discuss the model's ability to unify physiological, behavioral, and lesion results and we use it to make novel predictions that can be tested experimentally. The model suggests a neural basis for sequence variations, shows that stimulation in the feedback pathway may have different effects depending on the balance of excitation and inhibition at the input to HVC from Uva, and predicts deviations from uniform expansion of syllables and gaps during HVC cooling.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: L. Gibb, 46-6133, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge, MA 02139 (E-mail: lgibb{at}mit.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. Gibb, T. Q. Gentner, and H. D. I. Abarbanel
Inhibition and Recurrent Excitation in a Computational Model of Sparse Bursting in Song Nucleus HVC
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1748 - 1762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.