|
|
||||||||
Report
Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642
Submitted 1 May 2003; accepted in final form 9 June 2003
When asked to compare two moving stimuli separated by a delay, observers must not only identify stimulus direction but also store it in memory. We examined the properties of this storage mechanism in two macaque monkeys by sequentially presenting two random-dot stimuli, sample and test, in opposite hemifields and introducing a random-motion mask during the delay. The mask interfered with performance only at the precise location of the test, 100200 ms after the start of the delay, and when its size and speed matched those of the remembered sample. This selective interference suggests that the representation of the motion stimulus in memory preserves its direction, speed, and size and is most fragile shortly after the completion of the encoding phase of the task. This precise preservation of sensory attributes of the motion stimulus suggests that the neural mechanisms involved in the processing of visual motion may also be involved in its storage.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Montaser-Kouhsari and M. Carrasco Perceptual asymmetries are preserved in short-term memory tasks Atten Percept Psychophys, November 1, 2009; 71(8): 1782 - 1792. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Merriam and C. L. Colby Active Vision in Parietal and Extrastriate Cortex Neuroscientist, October 1, 2005; 11(5): 484 - 493. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Bennett and G. R. Barnes Predictive Smooth Ocular Pursuit During the Transient Disappearance of a Visual Target J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 578 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |