HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 90/6/3902    most recent 00284.2003v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wiedemann, U. A. Articles by Lüthi, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wiedemann, U. A. Articles by Lüthi, A.

Timing of Network Synchronization By Refractory Mechanisms

¹ Centre Européen de Recherche Nucléaire, Theory Division, CH-1211 Geneva 23 ² Biozentrum, Division of Pharmacology and Neurobiology, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland

Submitted 24 March 2003; accepted in final form 14 August 2003

Even without active pacemaker mechanisms, temporally patterned synchronization of neural network activity can emerge spontaneously and is involved in neural development and information processing. Generation of spontaneous synchronization is thought to arise as an alternating sequence between a state of elevated excitation followed by a period of quiescence associated with neuronal and/or synaptic refractoriness. However, the cellular factors controlling recruitment and timing of synchronized events have remained difficult to specify, although the specific temporal pattern of spontaneous rhythmogenesis determines its impact on developmental processes. We studied spontaneous synchronization in a model of 600–1,000 integrate-and-fire neurons interconnected with a probability of 5–30%. One-third of neurons generated spontaneous discharges and provided a background of intrinsic activity to the network. The heterogeneity and random coupling of these neurons maintained this background activity asynchronous. Refractoriness was modeled either by use-dependent synaptic depression or by cellular afterhyperpolarization. In both cases, the recruitment of neurons into spontaneous synchronized discharges was determined by the interplay of refractory mechanisms with stochastic fluctuations in background activity. Subgroups of easily recruitable neurons served as amplifiers of these fluctuations, thereby initiating a cascade-like recruitment of neurons ("avalanche effect"). In contrast, timing depended on the precise implementation of neuronal refractoriness and synaptic connectivity. With synaptic depression, neuronal synchronization always occurred stochastically, whereas with cellular afterhyperpolarization, stochastic turned into periodic behavior with increasing synaptic strength. These results associate the type of refractory mechanism with the temporal statistics and the mechanism of synchronization, thereby providing a framework for differentiating between cellular mechanisms of spontaneous rhythmogenesis.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. I. Netoff, R. Clewley, S. Arno, T. Keck, and J. A. White Epilepsy in Small-World Networks J. Neurosci., September 15, 2004; 24(37): 8075 - 8083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. K. Kosmidis, O. Pierrefiche, and J.-F. Vibert Respiratory-Like Rhythmic Activity Can Be Produced by an Excitatory Network of Non-Pacemaker Neuron Models J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2004; 92(2): 686 - 699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Giugliano, P. Darbon, M. Arsiero, H.-R. Luscher, and J. Streit Single-Neuron Discharge Properties and Network Activity in Dissociated Cultures of Neocortex J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2004; 92(2): 977 - 996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]