JN AJP citation statistics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (September 17, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90210.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures and Tables
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/5/2712    most recent
90210.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by von Kriegstein, K.
Right arrow Articles by McAlpine, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by von Kriegstein, K.
Right arrow Articles by McAlpine, D.
Submitted on January 30, 2008
Revised on September 10, 2008
Accepted on September 11, 2008

Responses to Interaural Time Delay in Human Cortex

Katharina von Kriegstein1, Timothy D. Griffiths, Sarah K. Thompson, and David McAlpine1*

1 University College London

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: d.mcalpine{at}ucl.ac.uk.

Humans use differences in the timing of sounds at the two ears to determine the location of a sound source. Various models have been posited for the neural representation of these interaural time differences (ITDs). These models make opposing predictions about the lateralization of ITD processing in the human brain. The weighted-image model predicts that sounds leading in time at one ear activate maximally the opposite brain hemisphere for all values of ITD. In contrast, the {pi}-limit model assumes that ITDs beyond half the period of the stimulus centre-frequency are not explicitly encoded in the brain, and that such 'long' ITDs activate maximally the side of the brain to which the sound is heard. A previous neuro-imaging study revealed activity in the human inferior colliculus consistent with the {pi}-limit. Here we show that, cortical responses to sounds with ITDs within the {pi}-limit are in line with the predictions of both models. However contrary to the immediate predictions of both models, neural activation is bilateral for 'long' ITDs, despite these being perceived as clearly lateralized. Furthermore, processing of long ITDs leads to higher activation in cortex than processing of short ITDs. These data show that coding of ITD in cortex is fundamentally different from coding of ITD in brainstem. We discuss these results in the context of the two models.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.