JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 12, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90230.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/1/150    most recent
90230.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herter, T. M
Right arrow Articles by Scott, S. H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herter, T. M
Right arrow Articles by Scott, S. H
Submitted on February 4, 2008
Revised on October 16, 2008
Accepted on November 4, 2008

Comparison of neural responses in primary motor cortex to transient and continuous loads during posture

Troy M Herter1, Tereza Korbel2, and Stephen H Scott2*

1 Queens University
2 Queen's University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: steve{at}biomed.queensu.ca.

The present study examined whether neurons in primary motor cortex (M1) exhibited similar responses to transient and continuous loads applied during posture. Rapid responses to whole-limb perturbations were examined by transiently applying (300 ms) flexor and extensor torques to the shoulder and/or elbow during postural maintenance. Over half of M1 neurons responded to these transient loads within 80 ms and many responded within 20 to 40 ms. These rapid responses exhibited a broad continuum of modulation patterns across load directions. At one extreme, neurons exhibited reciprocal increases and decreases in activity for opposing loads. At the other extreme, neurons (particularly those with onset times of 20 to 40 ms) displayed relatively uniform increases in activity for all loads. Activity of proximal arm muscles displayed a narrower distribution of modulation patterns characterized by broadly tuned excitation combined with little or no reciprocal inhibition. Both neurons and muscles showed a directional preference for whole-limb flexor and whole-limb extensor torques (flexor at one joint and extensor at the other). Most neurons with rapid responses also showed steady-state responses to continuous loads although these responses generally displayed reciprocal increases and decreases in activity for opposing loads. Importantly, the preferred-torque directions were quantitatively similar across tasks. For example, a neuron with a maximal rapid response to a transient elbow flexor torque tended to exhibit a maximal steady-state response to a continuous elbow flexor torque. Activity of proximal arm muscles also showed this preservation of directional tuning. These results illustrate that M1 neurons respond rapidly to transient multi-joint loads and their patterns of activity share some, but not all, features related to continuous multi-joint loads applied during posture.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Kurtzer, J. A. Pruszynski, and S. H. Scott
Long-Latency Responses During Reaching Account for the Mechanical Interaction Between the Shoulder and Elbow Joints
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2009; 102(5): 3004 - 3015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.