JN Miami Valley Hospital
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (April 2, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90237.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/6/2798    most recent
90237.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nuding, U.
Right arrow Articles by Glasauer, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nuding, U.
Right arrow Articles by Glasauer, S.
Submitted on February 6, 2008
Revised on March 20, 2008
Accepted on March 21, 2008

A theory of the dual pathways for smooth pursuit based on dynamic gain control

Ulrich Nuding1*, Seiji Ono2, Michael J Mustari2, Ulrich Buttner3, and Stefan Glasauer4

1 Ludwig-Maximilians-University
2 Yerkes National Primate Research Center
3 Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich
4 Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: unuding{at}nefo.med.uni-muenchen.de.

The smooth pursuit eye movement (SPEM) system is much more sensitive to target motion perturbations during pursuit than during fixation. This sensitivity is commonly attributed to a dynamic gain control mechanism. Neither the neural substrate nor the functional architecture for this gain control has been fully revealed. There are at least two cortical areas that crucially contribute to smooth pursuit and are therefore eligible sites for dynamic gain control: The medial superior temporal area (MST) and the pursuit area of the frontal eye fields (FEF), which both project to brainstem premotor structures via parallel pathways. The aim of this study was to develop a model of smooth pursuit based on behavioral, anatomical, and neurophysiological results to account for nonlinear dynamic gain control. Using a behavioral paradigm in humans consisting of a sinusoidal oscillation (4 Hz, ±8 deg/s) superimposed on a constant velocity target motion (0-24 deg/s), we were able to identify relevant gain control parameters in the model. A salient feature of our model is the emergence of two parallel pathways from higher visual cortical to lower motor areas in the brainstem that correspond to the MST and FEF pathways. Detailed analysis of the model revealed that one pathway mainly carries eye velocity related signals, while the other is mostly associated with eye acceleration. From comparison with known neurophysiological results we conclude that the dynamic gain control can be attributed to the FEF pathway, while the MST pathway serves as the basic circuit for maintaining an ongoing SPEM.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
U. Nuding, R. Kalla, N. G. Muggleton, U. Buttner, V. Walsh, and S. Glasauer
TMS Evidence for Smooth Pursuit Gain Control by the Frontal Eye Fields
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2008; (2008) bhn162v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
S. Ono and M. J. Mustari
Smooth Pursuit-Related Information Processing in Frontal Eye Field Neurons that Project to the NRTP
Cereb Cortex, September 26, 2008; (2008) bhn166v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.