JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (July 2, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90241.2008 Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/3/1397    most recent
90241.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, P. C. J
Right arrow Articles by Nobre, A. C. C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, P. C. J
Right arrow Articles by Nobre, A. C. C
Submitted on February 6, 2008
Revised on June 23, 2008
Accepted on June 26, 2008

Choosing where to attend and the medial frontal cortex: an fMRI study

Paul Christopher J Taylor1*, Matthew FS Rushworth2, and Anna Christina C Nobre3

1 Birkbeck College
2 University of Oxford
3 Department of Psychology, University of Oxford

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pc.taylor{at}psychiology.bbk.ac.uk.

In order to investigate how we orient our spatial attention, previous studies have recorded neural activity while participants are instructed where to attend. Here we contrast this classical instructed attention condition with a novel condition in which the focus of voluntary attention is not specified by the experimenter but rather is freely chosen by the participant. Central cues prompted fixating participants either to choose which of two peripheral spatial locations to covertly attend, or formed an instruction. Either type of cueing initiated selective attention demonstrated behaviourally by enhanced performance at a visual detection task, in comparison to a separate divided attention condition. We used fMRI to measure which areas were more active during choice than instruction. Choosing where to attend activated a large cluster of medial frontal cortical regions similar to those that have been previously implicated in the free selection of overt action. We then addressed a potential confound in contrasting choice with instruction: participants may remember their behaviour more when choosing. In a separate block, and interleaved with choice trials, 'memory' trials were introduced in which participants were instructed to remember where they had attended on the previous trial. The presupplementary eye fields and lateral frontal eye fields were specialised for choice-guided attentional orienting over and above any memory confound. This evidence suggests a common mechanism may underlie free selection, whether for covert attention or overt saccades.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.