JN Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 18, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90245.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/3/1620    most recent
90245.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Luca, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Luca, C. J.
Submitted on February 6, 2008
Revised on June 16, 2008
Accepted on June 16, 2008

Motor Unit Recruitment and Proprioceptive Feedback Decrease the Common Drive

Carlo J. De Luca1*

1 Boston University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cjd{at}bu.edu.

It has been documented that concurrently active motor units fire under the control of a common drive. That is, the firing rates of motor units are cross-correlated with near-zero time lag.. This degree of cross-correlation has been found to vary among muscles, and among contractions performed at different force levels in the same muscle. This study provides an explanation indicating that motor units recruited during a contraction cause an increase in the variation (standard deviation) and a decrease in the degree (amplitude) of the cross-correlation of the firing rates. The degree of cross-correlation is lower in muscles having greater spindle density. This effect appears to be mediated by the proprioceptive feedback from the spindles and possibly the Golgi tendon organs. Muscle spindles in particular respond to the mechanical excitation of the non-fused muscle fibers and provide a discordant excitation to the homonymous motoneurons, resulting in a decrease in the cross-correlation of the firing rates of motor units. The implication of this work is that the decreased cross-correlation of the firing rates in some muscles is not necessarily an indication of a decreased common drive from the Central Nervous System, but rather an inhibitory influence of the proprioceptive feedback from the Peripheral Nervous System. This explanation is useful for understanding various manifestations of the common drive reported in the literature.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. A. Minetto, A. Holobar, A. Botter, and D. Farina
Discharge Properties of Motor Units of the Abductor Hallucis Muscle During Cramp Contractions
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1890 - 1901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
P. Contessa, A. Adam, and C. J. De Luca
Motor unit control and force fluctuation during fatigue
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2009; 107(1): 235 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.