|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Queen's Univesity
2 Queen's University
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: steve{at}biomed.queensu.ca.
Considerable research has established that rapid motor responses (traditionally called reflexes), can be modified by a subject's voluntary goals. Here, we expand on past observations using verbal instructions by defining the voluntary goal via visual target position. This approach allowed us to objectively enforce task-adherence and explore a richer set of variables, such as target direction and distance; metrics that modify voluntary control and we hypothesize will influence rapid motor responses. Our first experiment tested whether upper-limb responses are categorically modulated by target direction by placing targets such that the same perturbation could push the hand into one target and out of the other, a spatial analogue to "resist/yield" verbal instructions. Consistent with these classical results, we found that the short-latency rapid response (R1, 20-45ms) was not modulated by target direction whereas long-latency rapid responses (R2/R3, 45-105ms) were modified in a manner approaching the voluntary response (VOL, 120-180ms). Our second experiment tested whether upper-limb responses are continuously modulated by target distance by distributing five targets along one axis centered on the hand. Here, the long-latency and voluntary response mirrored the task demands by increasing activity in a graded fashion with increasing target distance. Our final experiment explored how upper-limb responses incorporate two-dimensional spatial information by placing targets radially around the hand. Notably, long-latency responses exhibited smooth tuning functions to target direction that were similar to those observed for the voluntary response. Taken together, these results illustrate the flexibility of long-latency rapid responses and emphasize their similarity to later voluntary responses.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Kurtzer, J. A. Pruszynski, and S. H. Scott Long-Latency Responses During Reaching Account for the Mechanical Interaction Between the Shoulder and Elbow Joints J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2009; 102(5): 3004 - 3015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Shemmell, J. H. An, and E. J. Perreault The Differential Role of Motor Cortex in Stretch Reflex Modulation Induced by Changes in Environmental Mechanics and Verbal Instruction J. Neurosci., October 21, 2009; 29(42): 13255 - 13263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. P. J. Selen, D. W. Franklin, and D. M. Wolpert Impedance Control Reduces Instability That Arises from Motor Noise J. Neurosci., October 7, 2009; 29(40): 12606 - 12616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kimura and H. Gomi Temporal Development of Anticipatory Reflex Modulation to Dynamical Interactions During Arm Movement J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2009; 102(4): 2220 - 2231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. R. Makin, N. P. Holmes, C. Brozzoli, Y. Rossetti, and A. Farne Coding of Visual Space during Motor Preparation: Approaching Objects Rapidly Modulate Corticospinal Excitability in Hand-Centered Coordinates J. Neurosci., September 23, 2009; 29(38): 11841 - 11851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Pruszynski, I. Kurtzer, T. P. Lillicrap, and S. H. Scott Temporal Evolution of "Automatic Gain-Scaling" J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 992 - 1003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Herter, T. Korbel, and S. H. Scott Comparison of Neural Responses in Primary Motor Cortex to Transient and Continuous Loads During Posture J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2009; 101(1): 150 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Franklin and D. M. Wolpert Specificity of Reflex Adaptation for Task-Relevant Variability J. Neurosci., December 24, 2008; 28(52): 14165 - 14175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. White, N. Dowling, R. M. Bracewell, and J. Diedrichsen Hand Interactions in Rapid Grip Force Adjustments Are Independent of Object Dynamics J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2008; 100(5): 2738 - 2745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |