JN AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (April 24, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90265.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/1/38    most recent
90265.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gardam, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Magoski, N. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gardam, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Magoski, N. S.
Submitted on February 12, 2008
Revised on April 9, 2008
Accepted on April 17, 2008

Flufenamic acid affects multiple currents and causes intracellular Ca2+ release in Aplysia bag cell neurons

Kate Elizabeth Gardam1, Julia Elizabeth Geiger1, Charlene Marie Hickey1, Anne Yun Hung1, and Neil Stephen Magoski1*

1 Queen's University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: magoski{at}post.queensu.ca.

Flufenamic acid (FFA) is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent, commonly used to block non-selective cation channels. We previously reported that FFA potentiated, rather than inhibited, a cation current in Aplysia bag cell neurons. Prompted by this paradoxical result, the present study examined the effects of FFA on membrane currents and intracellular Ca2+ in cultured bag cell neurons. Under whole-cell voltage-clamp, FFA evoked either outward (Iout) or inward (Iin) currents. Iout had a rapid onset, was inhibited by the K+ channel blocker, tetraethylammonium, and was associated with both an increase in membrane conductance and a negative shift in the whole-cell current reversal potential. Iin developed more slowly, was inhibited by the cation channel blocker, Gd3+, and was concomitant with both an increased conductance and positive shift in reversal potential. FFA also enhanced the use-dependent inactivation and caused a positive-shift in the activation curve of the voltage-dependent Ca2+ current. Furthermore, as measured by ratiometric imaging, FFA produced a rise in intracellular Ca2+ that persisted in the absence of extracellular Ca2+, and was reduced by depleting either the endoplasmic reticulum and/or mitochondrial stores. Ca2+ appeared to be involved in the activation of Iin, as strong intracellular Ca2+ buffering effectively eliminated Iin, but did not alter Iout. Finally, the effects of FFA were likely not due to block of cyclooxygenase, given that the general cyclooxygenase inhibitor, indomethacin, failed to evoke either current. That FFA influences a number of neuronal properties needs to be taken into consideration when employing it as a cation channel antagonist.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.