JN AJP: Endocrinology and Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (March 4, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.90291.2008 Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/5/2620    most recent
90291.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garrido, M. I
Right arrow Articles by Friston, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garrido, M. I
Right arrow Articles by Friston, K. J.
Submitted on February 21, 2008
Revised on February 24, 2009
Accepted on February 24, 2009

Dynamic causal modelling of the response to frequency deviants

Marta I Garrido1*, James M. Kilner2, Stefan J Kiebel3, and Karl J. Friston4

1 UCLA
2 Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging
3 University College London
4 UCL

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: m.garrido{at}fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk.

This paper describes the use of dynamic causal modelling to test hypotheses about the genesis of evoked responses. Specifically, we consider the mismatch negativity (MMN), a well characterised response to deviant sounds and one of the most widely studied evoked responses. There have been several mechanistic accounts of how the MMN might arise. It has been suggested that the MMN results from a comparison between sensory input and a memory trace of previous input but others have argued that local adaptation, due to stimulus repetition, is sufficient to explain the MMN. Thus, the precise mechanisms underlying the generation of the MMN remain unclear. This paper tests some biologically plausible spatiotemporal dipole models that rest on changes in extrinsic top-down connections (that enable comparison) and intrinsic changes (that model adaption). Dynamic causal modelling (DCM) suggested that responses to deviants are best explained by changes in effective connectivity both within and between cortical sources in a hierarchical network of distributed sources. Our model comparison suggests that both adaptation and memory comparison operate in concert to produce the early (N1 enhancement) and late (MMN) parts of the response to frequency deviants. We consider these mechanisms in the light of predictive coding and hierarchical inference in the brain.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.