JN Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (October 15, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90303.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/6/3253    most recent
90303.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sun, C.
Right arrow Articles by Chalupa, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sun, C.
Right arrow Articles by Chalupa, L. M.
Submitted on February 25, 2008
Revised on August 27, 2008
Accepted on October 7, 2008

Epibatidine application in vitro blocks retinal waves without silencing all retinal ganglion cell action potentials in developing retina of the mouse and ferret

Chao Sun1, Colenso McNaughton Speer1, Guoyong Wang2, Barbara Chapman3, and Leo M. Chalupa4*

1 University of California Davis
2 Tulane University
3 UC Davis
4 University of California, Davis

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lmchalupa{at}ucdavis.edu.

Epibatidine (EPI), a potent cholinergic agonist, disrupts acetylcholine-dependent spontaneous retinal activity. Early patch-clamp recordings in juvenile ferrets suggested that EPI blocks all retinal ganglion cell (RGC) action potentials when applied to the retina. In contrast, recent experiments on the developing mouse that relied on multi-electrode array (MEA) recordings reported that EPI application decorrelates the activity of neighboring RGCs and eliminates retinal waves while preserving the spiking activity of many neurons. The different techniques used in previous studies raises the question of whether EPI has different effects on RGC activity in mouse as compared to the ferret. A resolution of this issue is essential for interpreting the results of developmental studies that relied on EPI to manipulate retinal activity. Our goal was to compare the effects of EPI on the spontaneous discharges of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in mouse and ferret using 60-electrode MEA as well as patch clamp recordings during the developmental stage when retinal waves are driven by acetylcholine in both species. We found that in both mouse and ferret EPI decorrelates RGC activity and eliminates retinal waves. However, EPI does not block all spontaneous activity in either species. Instead, our whole-cell recordings reveal that EPI silences more than half of all RGCs while significantly increasing the activity of the remainder. These results have important implications for interpreting the results of previous studies that relied on this cholinergic agonist to perturb retinal activity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Rebsam, T. J. Petros, and C. A. Mason
Switching Retinogeniculate Axon Laterality Leads to Normal Targeting but Abnormal Eye-Specific Segregation That Is Activity Dependent
J. Neurosci., November 25, 2009; 29(47): 14855 - 14863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.