JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (July 2, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90340.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/3/1384    most recent
90340.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ji, W.
Right arrow Articles by Suga, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ji, W.
Right arrow Articles by Suga, N.
Submitted on March 7, 2008
Revised on June 26, 2008
Accepted on July 1, 2008

Tone-specific and nonspecific plasticity of the auditory cortex elicited by pseudo-conditioning: Role of acetylcholine receptors and the somatosensory cortex

Weiqing Ji1* and Nobuo Suga2

1 Washington University
2 Washington university

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ji{at}biology.wustl.edu.

Experience-dependent plastic changes in the central sensory systems are due to activation of both the sensory and neuromodulatory systems. Nonspecific changes of cortical auditory neurons elicited by pseudo-conditioning are quite different from tone-specific changes of the neurons elicited by auditory fear conditioning. Therefore, the neural circuit evoking the nonspecific changes must also be different from that evoking the tone-specific changes. We first examined changes in the response properties of cortical auditory neurons of the big brown bat elicited by pseudo-conditioning with unpaired tonal (CSu) and electric leg (USu) stimuli and found that it elicited nonspecific changes to CSu (a heart-rate decrease, an auditory response increase, a broadening of frequency tuning and a decrease in threshold) and, in addition, a small tone-specific change to CSu (a small short-lasting best frequency shift) only when CSu was 5 kHz lower than the best frequency of a recorded neuron. We then examined the effects of drugs on the cortical changes elicited by the pseudo-conditioning. The development of the nonspecific changes was little affected by atropine (a muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonist) and mecamylamine (a nicotinic cholinergic receptor antagonist) applied to the auditory cortex and by muscimol (a GABA-A receptor agonist) applied to the somatosensory cortex. However, these drugs abolished the small short-lasting tone-specific change as they abolished the large long-lasting tone-specific change elicited by auditory fear conditioning. Our current results indicate that, different from the tone-specific change, the nonspecific changes depend on neither the cholinergic neuromodulator nor the somatosensory cortex.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.