JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 19, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90362.2008 Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/1/31    most recent
90362.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, S. N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, S. N
Submitted on March 13, 2008
Revised on November 11, 2008
Accepted on November 11, 2008

Circuits Generating Corticomuscular Coherence Investigated Using a Biophysically based Computational Model. I. Descending Systems

Elizabeth Rhiannon Williams1 and Stuart N Baker2*

1 Newcastle University
2 University of Newcastle

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: stuart.baker{at}ncl.ac.uk.

Recordings of motor cortical activity typically show oscillations around 10 Hz and 20 Hz; only those at 20 Hz are coherent with electromyogram (EMG) of contralateral muscles. Experimental measurements of the phase difference between ~20 Hz oscillations in cortex and muscle are often difficult to reconcile with the known corticomuscular conduction delays. We investigated the generation of corticomuscular coherence further using a biophysically-based computational model, which included a pool of motoneurons connected to motor units which generated EMG. Delays estimated from the coherence phase-frequency relationship were sensitive to the width of motor unit action potential. In addition, the non-linear properties of the motoneurons could produce complex, oscillatory phase-frequency relationships. This was due to the interaction of cortical inputs to the motoneuron pool with the intrinsic rhythmicity of the motoneurons; the response appeared more linear if the firing rate of motoneurons varied widely across the pool, such as during a strong contraction. The model was able to reproduce the smaller than expected delays between cortex and muscles seen in experiments. However, the model could not reproduce the constant phase over a frequency band sometimes seen in experiments, nor the lack of ~10 Hz coherence. Simple propagation of oscillations from cortex to muscle cannot therefore completely explain the observed corticomuscular coherence.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. R. Williams, D. S. Soteropoulos, and S. N. Baker
Coherence Between Motor Cortical Activity and Peripheral Discontinuities During Slow Finger Movements
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 1296 - 1309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. R. Williams and S. N. Baker
Renshaw Cell Recurrent Inhibition Improves Physiological Tremor by Reducing Corticomuscular Coupling at 10 Hz
J. Neurosci., May 20, 2009; 29(20): 6616 - 6624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.