JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 25, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90363.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/3/1677    most recent
90363.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farshadmanesh, F.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farshadmanesh, F.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, J. D.
Submitted on March 13, 2008
Revised on June 23, 2008
Accepted on June 24, 2008

Neck muscle synergies during stimulation and inactivation of the interstitial nucleus of Cajal (INC)

Farshad Farshadmanesh1, Pengfei Chang2, Hongying Wang1, Xiaogang Yan1, Brian D Corneil3, and J. Douglas Crawford1*

1 York University
2 Neurosceince Center, Yuquan Hospital, Tsinghua University
3 University of Western Ontario

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jdc{at}yorku.ca.

The interstitial nucleus of Cajal (INC) is thought to control torsional and vertical head posture. Unilateral microstimulation of the INC evokes torsional head rotation to positions that are maintained until stimulation offset. Unilateral INC inactivation evokes head position-holding deficits with the head tilted in the opposite direction. However, the underlying muscle synergies for these opposite behavioral effects are unknown. Here, we examined neck muscle activity in head-unrestrained monkeys before and during stimulation (50 µA., 200 ms, 300 Hz) and inactivation (injection of 0.3 µl of 0.05% muscimol) of the same INC sites. Three-dimensional eye and head movements were recorded simultaneously with electromyographic (EMG) activity in six bilateral neck muscles: sternocleidomastoid (SCM), splenius capitis (SP), rectus capitis posterior major (RCPmaj.), occipital capitis inferior (OCI), complexus (COM) and biventer cervicis (BC). INC stimulation evoked a phasic, short-latency (~5-10 ms) facilitation and later (~100-200 ms) a more tonic facilitation in the activity of ipsi-SCM, ipsi-SP, ipsi-COM, ipsi-BC, contra-RCPmaj. and contra-OCI. Unilateral INC inactivation led to an increase in the activity of contra-SCM, ipsi-SP, ipsi-RCPmaj. and ipsi-OCI, and a decrease in the activity of contra-RCPmaj. and contra-OCI. Thus, the influence of INC stimulation and inactivation were opposite on some muscles (i.e., contra-OCI and contra-RCPmaj.), but the comparative influences on other neck muscles were more variable. These results show that the relationship between the neck muscle responses during INC stimulation and inactivation is much more complex than the relationship between the overt behaviors.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.