JN AJP: Endocrinology and Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (July 9, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90374.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/3/1602    most recent
90374.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krebs, B.
Right arrow Articles by Grothe, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krebs, B.
Right arrow Articles by Grothe, B.
Submitted on March 19, 2008
Revised on July 3, 2008
Accepted on July 4, 2008

The representation of amplitude modulations in the mammalian auditory midbrain

Bjarne Krebs1, Nicholas A Lesica2, and Benedikt Grothe3*

1 Max-Planck-Institute of Neurobiology
2 LMU Munich
3 Max-Planck-Institute of neurobiology

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: grothe{at}lmu.de.

Temporal modulations in stimulus amplitude are essential for recognizing and categorizing behaviorally relevant acoustic signals such as speech. Despite this behavioral importance, it remains unclear how amplitude modulations (AMs) are represented in the responses of neurons at higher levels of the auditory system. Studies utilizing stimuli with sinusoidal amplitude modulations (SAMs) have demonstrated that the responses of many neurons are strongly tuned to modulation frequency, leading to the hypothesis that AMs are represented by their periodicity in the auditory midbrain. However, AMs in general are defined not only by their modulation frequency, but also by a number of other parameters (duration, duty cycle, etc), which covary with modulation frequency in SAM stimuli. Thus, the relationship between modulation frequency and neural responses as characterized with SAM stimuli alone is ambiguous. In this study, we characterize the representation of AMs in the gerbil inferior colliculus by analyzing neural responses to a series of pulse trains in which duration and inter-pulse interval are systematically varied to quantify the importance of duration, inter-pulse interval, duty cycle, and modulation frequency independently. We find that, while modulation frequency is indeed an important parameter for some neurons, the responses of many neurons are also strongly influenced by other AM parameters, typically duration and duty cycle. These results suggest that AMs are represented in the auditory midbrain not only by their periodicity, but by a complex combination of several important parameters.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H.-R. Geis and J. G. G. Borst
Intracellular Responses of Neurons in the Mouse Inferior Colliculus to Sinusoidal Amplitude-Modulated Tones
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2009; 101(4): 2002 - 2016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.