JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (April 9, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90376.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/6/2877    most recent
90376.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Feiler, A. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Feiler, A. M
Submitted on March 19, 2008
Accepted on April 2, 2008

Two kinds of fMRI repetition suppression? Evidence for dissociable neural mechanisms

Russell Alan Epstein1*, Whitney E. Parker1, and Alana M Feiler

1 University of Pennsylvania

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: epstein{at}psych.upenn.edu.

Repetition suppression (RS) is a reduction of neural response that is often observed when stimuli are presented more than once. Many functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have exploited RS to probe the sensitivity of cortical regions to variations in different stimulus dimensions; however, the neural mechanisms underlying fMRI-RS are not fully understood. Here we test the hypothesis that long-interval (between-trial) and short-interval (within-trial) RS effects are caused by distinct and independent neural mechanisms. Subjects were scanned while viewing visual scenes that were repeated over both long and short intervals. Within the parahippocampal place area (PPA) and other brain regions, suppression effects relating to both long- and short-interval repetition were observed. Critically, two sources of evidence indicated that these effects were engendered by different underlying mechanisms. First, long- and short-interval RS effects were entirely non-interactive even though they were measured within the same set of trials during which subjects performed a constant behavioral task, thus fulfilling the formal requirements for a process dissociation. Second, long- and short-interval RS were differentially sensitive to viewpoint: short-interval RS was only significant when scenes were repeated from the same viewpoint while long-interval RS less viewpoint-dependent. Taken together, these results indicate that long- and short-interval fMRI-RS are mediated by different neural mechanisms that independently modulate the overall fMRI signal. These findings have important implications for understanding the results of studies that use fMRI-RS to explore representational spaces.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.