JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (July 16, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90396.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/4/2348    most recent
90396.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Povysheva, N. V
Right arrow Articles by Krimer, L. S
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Povysheva, N. V
Right arrow Articles by Krimer, L. S
Submitted on March 24, 2008
Revised on June 25, 2008
Accepted on July 14, 2008

Parvalbumin-positive Basket Interneurons in Monkey and Rat Prefrontal Cortex

Nadezhda V Povysheva1*, Aleksey V Zaitsev2, Diana C Rotaru, Guillermo Gonzalez-Burgos3, David A Lewis, and Leonid S Krimer

1 University of Pittsburgh
2 Trinity College
3 University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nvp1{at}pitt.edu.

Differences in the developmental origin and relative proportions of biochemically distinct classes of cortical neurons have been found between rodents and primates. In addition, species differences in the properties of certain cell types, such as neurogliaform cells, have also been reported. Consequently, in this study we compared the anatomical and physiological properties of parvalbumin (PV)-positive basket interneurons in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) of macaque monkeys and rats. The somal size, total dendritic length, and horizontal and vertical spans of the axonal arbor were similar in monkeys and rats. Physiologically, PV basket cells could be identified as fast spiking (FS) interneurons in both species based on their short spike and high frequency firing without adaptation. However, important interspecies differences in the intrinsic physiological properties were found. In monkeys, basket cells had a higher input resistance and a lower firing threshold, and they generated more spikes at near-threshold current intensities than those in rats. Thus, monkey basket cells appeared to be more excitable. In addition, rat basket cells consistently fired the first spike with a substantial delay, and generated spike trains interrupted by quiescent periods more often than monkey basket cells. The frequency of miniature excitatory post-synaptic potentials (mEPSP)s in basket cells was considerably higher in rats than in monkeys. These differences between rats and monkeys in the electrophysiological properties of PV-positive basket cells may contribute to the differential patterns of neuronal activation observed in rats and monkeys performing working memory tasks.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.