JN Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 4, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90406.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/2/646    most recent
90406.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scholl, B.
Right arrow Articles by Wehr, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scholl, B.
Right arrow Articles by Wehr, M.
Submitted on March 26, 2008
Revised on May 30, 2008
Accepted on June 1, 2008

Disruption of Balanced Cortical Excitation and Inhibition by Acoustic Trauma

Ben Scholl1 and Michael Wehr1*

1 University of Oregon

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wehr{at}uoregon.edu.

Sensory deafferentation results in rapid shifts in the receptive fields of cortical neurons, but the synaptic mechanisms underlying these changes remain unknown. The rapidity of these shifts has led to the suggestion that subthreshold inputs may be unmasked by a selective loss of inhibition. To investigate this, we used in vivo whole cell recordings to directly measure tone-evoked excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs in auditory cortical neurons before and after acoustic trauma. Here we report that acute acoustic trauma disrupted the balance of excitation and inhibition by selectively increasing and reducing the strength of inhibition at different positions within the receptive field. Inhibition was abolished for frequencies far below the trauma-tone frequency, but was markedly enhanced near the edges of the region of elevated peripheral threshold. These changes occurred for relatively high-level tones. These changes in inhibition led to an expansion of receptive fields, but not by a simple unmasking process. Rather, membrane potential responses were delayed and prolonged throughout the receptive field, by distinct interactions between synaptic excitation and inhibition. Far below the trauma-tone frequency, decreased inhibition combined with prolonged excitation led to increased responses. Near the edges of the region of elevated peripheral threshold, increased inhibition served to delay rather than abolish responses which were driven by prolonged excitation. These results demonstrate that the rapid receptive field shifts caused by acoustic trauma are due to distinct mechanisms at different positions within the receptive field, which depend on differential disruption of excitation and inhibition.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.