JN Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 18, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90428.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/3/1690    most recent
90428.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Avanzino, L.
Right arrow Articles by Abbruzzese, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Avanzino, L.
Right arrow Articles by Abbruzzese, G.
Submitted on April 2, 2008
Revised on May 27, 2008
Accepted on June 12, 2008

Interaction between finger opposition movements and aftereffects of 1Hz-rTMS on ipsilateral motor cortex

Laura Avanzino1, Marco Bove1, Andrea Tacchino1, Carlo Trompetto1, Carla Ogliastro1, and Giovanni Abbruzzese1*

1 University of Genoa

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: giabbr{at}unige.it.

1Hz-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (1Hz-rTMS) over ipsilateral motor cortex is able to modify up to 30 minutes the motor performance of repetitive finger opposition movements paced with a metronome at 2Hz. We investigated whether the long lasting rTMS effect on motor behaviour can be modulated by subsequent engagement of the contralateral sensorimotor system. Motor task was performed in different experimental conditions: immediately after rTMS, 30 minutes after rTMS or when real rTMS was substituted with sham rTMS. Subjects performing the motor task immediately after rTMS showed modifications in motor behaviour up to 30 minutes after rTMS. On the other hand, when real rTMS was substituted with sham stimulation or when subjects performed the motor task 30 minutes after the rTMS session, the effect was no longer present. These findings suggest that the combination of ipsilateral 1Hz-rTMS and voluntary movement is crucial to endure the effect of rTMS on the movement itself probably acting on synaptic plasticity-like mechanism. This finding might provide some useful hints for neurorehabilitation protocols.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.