JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (July 30, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90614.2008 Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/4/2397    most recent
90614.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Radhakrishnan, S. M
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Radhakrishnan, S. M
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, A.
Submitted on May 28, 2008
Revised on July 23, 2008
Accepted on July 25, 2008

Learning a novel myoelectric-controlled interface task

Saritha M Radhakrishnan1, Stuart N Baker1, and Andrew Jackson1*

1 University of Newcastle

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: andrew.jackson{at}ncl.ac.uk.

Control of myoelectric prostheses and brain-machine interfaces requires learning abstract neuromotor transformations. To investigate the mechanisms underlying this ability, we trained subjects to move a two-dimensional cursor using a myoelectric-controlled interface. With the upper-limb immobilised, electromyogram from multiple hand and arm muscles moved the cursor in directions that were either intuitive or non-intuitive, and with high or low variability. We found that subjects could learn even non-intuitive arrangements to a high level of performance. Muscle tuning functions were cosine-shaped and modulated so as to reduce cursor variability. Subjects exhibited an additional preference for using hand muscles over arm muscles which resulted from a greater capacity of these to form novel, task-specific synergies. In a second experiment, non-visual feedback from the hand was degraded with amplitude- and frequency-modulated vibration. Although vibration impaired task performance, it did not affect the rate at which learning occurred. We therefore conclude that the motor system can acquire internal models of novel, abstract neuromotor mappings even in the absence of overt movements or accurate proprioceptive signals, but that the distal motor system may be better suited to provide flexible control signals for neuromotor prostheses than structures related to the arm.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. Ganguly, L. Secundo, G. Ranade, A. Orsborn, E. F. Chang, D. F. Dimitrov, J. D. Wallis, N. M. Barbaro, R. T. Knight, and J. M. Carmena
Cortical Representation of Ipsilateral Arm Movements in Monkey and Man
J. Neurosci., October 14, 2009; 29(41): 12948 - 12956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.