JN Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (September 24, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90620.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/5/2878    most recent
90620.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stucke, A. G
Right arrow Articles by Stuth, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stucke, A. G
Right arrow Articles by Stuth, E. A.
Submitted on May 28, 2008
Revised on August 28, 2008
Accepted on September 12, 2008

Opioid receptors on bulbospinal respiratory neurons are not activated during neuronal depression by clinically relevant opioid concentrations

Astrid G Stucke1, Edward J. Zuperku2, Antonio Sanchez3, Mislav Tonkovic-Capin1, Viseslav Tonkovic-Capin1, Sanda Mustapic4, and Eckehard A. Stuth3*

1 VA Medical Center - Research Service 151
2 Medical College of Wisconsin
3 VA Medical Center- Research Service 151
4 VA Medical Center -Research Service 151

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: estuth{at}mcw.edu.

Opioids depress the activity of brainstem respiratory-related neurons but it is not resolved whether the mechanism at clinical concentrations consists of direct neuronal effects or network effects. We performed extracellular recordings of discharge activity of single respiratory neurons in the caudal ventral respiratory group of decerebrate dogs, which were premotor neurons with a likelihood of 90%. We used multibarrel glass microelectrodes, which allowed concomitant highly localized picoejection of opioid receptor agonists or antagonists onto the neuron. 1. Picoejection of the µ receptor agonist [D-Ala2, N-Me-phe4, gly-ol5]-Enkephalin (DAMGO, 1 mM) decreased the peak discharge frequency (mean±s.d.) of expiratory neurons to 68 ± 22% (n=12), the {delta}1 agonist D-Pen2,5-Enkephalin (DPDPE, 1 mM) to 95 ± 11% (n=15), and {delta}2 receptor agonist [D-Ala2] deltorphin-II to 86 ± 17 % (1 mM, n=15). The corresponding values for inspiratory neurons were: 64 ± 12% (n=11), 48 ± 30% (n=12) and 75 ± 15% (n=11), respectively. Naloxone fully reversed these effects. 2. Picoejection of morphine (0.01-1mM) depressed most neurons in a concentration dependent fashion to maximally 63% (n=27). 3. Picoejection of remifentanil (240-480 nM) did not cause any significant depression of inspiratory (n = 11) or expiratory neurons (n=9). 4. Intravenous remifentanil (0.2-0.6 µg/kg/min) decreased neuronal peak discharge frequency to 60 ± 12% (inspiratory, n=7) and 58 ± 11% (expiratory, n=11). However, local picoejection of naloxone did not reverse the neuronal depression. Our data suggest that µ, {delta}1 and {delta}2 receptors are present on canine respiratory premotor neurons. Clinical concentrations of morphine and remifentanil caused no local depression. This lack of effect and the inability of local naloxone to reverse the neuronal depression by intravenous remifentanil suggest that clinical concentrations of opioids produce their depressive effects on mechanisms upstream from respiratory bulbospinal premotor neurons.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.