JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (January 14, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.90650.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/4/1867    most recent
90650.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, D. B. T.
Right arrow Articles by Olson, C. R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, D. B. T.
Right arrow Articles by Olson, C. R
Submitted on June 19, 2008
Revised on January 8, 2009
Accepted on January 8, 2009

Linearly Additive Shape and Color Signals in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex

David B. T. McMahon1* and Carl R Olson2

1 National Institute of Mental Health
2 Carnegie Mellon University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mcmahond{at}mail.nih.gov.

How does the brain represent a red circle? One possibility is that there is a specialized and possibly time-consuming process whereby the attributes of shape and color, carried by separate populations of neurons in low-order visual cortex, are bound together into a unitary neural representation. Another possibility is that neurons in high-order visual cortex are selective, by virtue of their bottom-up input from low-order visual areas, for particular conjunctions of shape and color. A third possibility is that they simply sum shape and color signals linearly. We tested these ideas by measuring the responses of IT neurons to sets of stimuli in which two attributes - shape and color - varied independently. We find that a few neurons exhibit conjunction selectivity but that in most neurons the influences of shape and color sum linearly. Contrary to the idea of conjunction coding, few neurons respond selectively to a particular combination of shape and color. Contrary to the idea that binding requires time, conjunction signals, when present, occur as early as feature signals. We argue that neither conjunction selectivity nor a specialized feature binding process is necessary for the effective representation of shape-color combinations.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.