JN Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (December 3, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90657.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/2/688    most recent
90657.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bell, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ungerleider, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bell, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ungerleider, L. G.
Submitted on June 10, 2008
Revised on November 24, 2008
Accepted on November 25, 2008

Object representations in the temporal cortex of monkeys and humans as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging

Andrew Harrison Bell1*, Fadila Hadj-Bouziane, Jennifer B Frihauf1, Roger B.H. Tootell2, and Leslie G. Ungerleider1

1 National Institute of Mental Health
2 Massachusetts General Hospital

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bellah{at}mail.nih.gov.

Increasing evidence suggests that the neural processes associated with identifying everyday stimuli include the classification of those stimuli into a limited number of semantic categories. How the neural representations of these stimuli are organized in the temporal lobe remains under debate. Here we used fMRI to identify correlates for three current hypotheses concerning object representations in the inferior temporal (IT) cortex of monkeys and humans: representations based on animacy, semantic categories, or visual features. Subjects were presented with blocked images of faces, body-parts (animate stimuli), objects, and places (inanimate stimuli) and multiple overlapping contrasts were used to identify the voxels most selective for each category. Stimulus representations appeared to segregate according to semantic relationships. Discrete regions selective for animate and inanimate stimuli were found in both species. These regions could be further subdivided into regions selective for individual categories. Notably, face-selective regions were contiguous with body-part selective regions, and object-selective regions were contiguous with place-selective regions. When category-selective regions in monkeys were tested with blocks of single exemplars, individual voxels showed preferences for visually dissimilar exemplars from the same category and voxels with similar preferences tended to cluster together. Our results provide some novel observations with respect to how stimulus representations are organized in IT cortex. In addition, they further support the idea that representations of complex stimuli in IT cortex are organized into multiple hierarchical tiers, encompassing both semantic and physical properties.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
E. Borra, N. Ichinohe, T. Sato, M. Tanifuji, and K. S. Rockland
Cortical Connections to Area TE in Monkey: Hybrid Modular and Distributed Organization
Cereb Cortex, May 23, 2009; (2009) bhp096v2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.