JN AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (September 10, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90673.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/5/2726    most recent
90673.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keller, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keller, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, J. A.
Submitted on June 12, 2008
Revised on September 5, 2008
Accepted on September 8, 2008

The Effect of Inactivation of the Cortical Frontal Eye Field on Saccades Generated in a Choice Response Paradigm

Edward L. Keller1*, Kyoung-Min Lee1, Se-Woong Park1, and Jessica A. Hill

1 Smith-Kettlewell Institute

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: elk{at}ski.org.

Previous studies using muscimol inactivations in the frontal eye fields (FEF) have shown that saccades generated by recall from working memory are eliminated by these lesions while visually-guided saccades are relatively spared. In the present experiments, we made reversible inactivations in FEF in alert macaque monkeys and examined the effect on saccades in a choice response task. Our task required monkeys to learn arbitrary pairings between colored stimuli and saccade direction. Following inactivations the percentage of choice errors increased as a function of the number of alternative (NA) pairings. In contrast, the percentage of dysmetric saccades (saccades that landed in the correct quadrant but were inaccurate) did not vary with NA. Saccade latency increased post-lesion, but did not increase with NA. We also made simultaneous inactivations in both FEF. The results following bilateral lesions showed approximately twice as many choice errors. We conclude that the FEF are involved in the generation of saccades in choice response tasks. The dramatic effect of NA on choice errors, but the lack of an effect of NA on motor errors or response latency, suggests that two types of processing are interrupted by FEF lesions. The first involves the formation of a saccadic intention vector from associate memory inputs, and the second, the execution of the saccade from the intention vector. The doubling of choice errors following bilateral FEF lesions suggests that the effect of unilateral lesions is not caused a general inhibition of the lesioned side by the intact side.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. Berman, W. M. Joiner, J. Cavanaugh, and R. H. Wurtz
Modulation of Presaccadic Activity in the Frontal Eye Field by the Superior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2009; 101(6): 2934 - 2942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.