JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (October 8, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90677.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/6/2981    most recent
90677.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacNeilage, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Angelaki, D. E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacNeilage, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Angelaki, D. E
Submitted on June 13, 2008
Revised on September 7, 2008
Accepted on October 2, 2008

Computational approaches to spatial orientation: from transfer functions to dynamic Bayesian inference

Paul Ryan MacNeilage1, Narayan Ganesan1, and Dora E Angelaki1*

1 Washington University School of Medicine

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: angelaki{at}wustl.edu.

Spatial orientation is the sense of body orientation and self-motion relative to the stationary environment, fundamental to normal waking behavior and control of everyday motor actions including eye movements, postural control and locomotion. The brain achieves spatial orientation by integrating visual, vestibular and somatosensory signals. Over the past years, considerable progress has been made toward understanding how these signals are processed by the brain using multiple computational approaches that include frequency domain analysis, the concept of internal models, observer theory, Bayesian decision theory, and Kalman filtering. Here we put these approaches in context by examining the specific questions that can be addressed by each technique and some of the scientific insights that have resulted. We conclude with a recent application of particle filtering, a probabilistic simulation technique that aims to generate the most likely state estimates by incorporating internal models of sensor dynamics and physical laws, noise associated with sensory processing, as well as prior knowledge or experience. In this framework, priors for low angular velocity and linear acceleration can explain the phenomena of velocity storage and frequency segregation, both of which have been modeled previously using arbitrary low-pass filtering. How Kalman and particle filters may be implemented by the brain is an emerging field. Unlike past neurophysiological research which has aimed to characterize mean responses of single neurons, investigations of dynamic Bayesian inference should attempt to characterize population activities that constitute probabilistic representations of sensory and prior information.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. F. Soechting, J. Z. Juveli, and H. M. Rao
Models for the Extrapolation of Target Motion for Manual Interception
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1491 - 1502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.