JN AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (April 8, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.90699.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures and Tables
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/1/100    most recent
90699.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Künsting, T.
Right arrow Articles by Spors, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Künsting, T.
Right arrow Articles by Spors, H.
Submitted on June 21, 2008
Revised on April 1, 2009
Accepted on April 1, 2009

Dynamics of input patterns modulate the behavior of a model of olfactory bulb function

Thomas Künsting1 and Hartwig Spors2*

1 Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Heidelberg
2 Max Planck Institute of Biophysics

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hartwig.spors{at}mpibp-frankfurt.mpg.de.

Input patterns to the olfactory bulb are dynamic and change in an odor-specific manner, as measured by selective calcium imaging of olfactory bulb input. To our knowledge, none of the published models of olfactory bulb function uses dynamic input patterns. Therefore we tested how dynamic input alters the behavior of a simple model consisting of two layers. The membrane potential of the first layer neurons, integrate and fire neurons corresponding to mitral cells, was modulated with a sub-threshold oscillation at respiration frequency. The membrane potential of the second layer neurons was used to discriminate input patterns. We implemented oscillating input with amplitudes and latencies different for each mitral cell. Not only varying the input amplitudes, but also de-synchronizing the input, and varying the relation between latency and input amplitude, individually changed the model's performance significantly. The discrimination time was affected more easily than the number of second layer neurons that can differentiate an odor pair. Increasing the de-synchronization, i.e. the spread of latency values, reduced the differences in response time between strong and weak stimulus pairs without reducing the number of reacting cells. Input phase relative to the sub-threshold oscillation altered the effect of de-synchronization. Thus, dynamic input changes performance parameters of models of olfactory information processing that can be verified experimentally.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.