JN Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 26, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90805.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/3/1560    most recent
90805.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abel, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kössl, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abel, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kössl, M.
Submitted on July 23, 2008
Revised on October 14, 2008
Accepted on November 23, 2008

Sensitive response to low frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain

Cornelius Abel1* and Manfred Kössl1

1 Institut für Zellbiologie und Neurowissenschaft, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt/Main, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: abel{at}zoology.uni-frankfurt.de.

During auditory stimulation with several frequency components, in the cochlea distortion products (DP) are generated as byproduct of nonlinear cochlear amplification. After generated DP energy is reemitted into the ear channel where it can be measured as distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and it also induces an excitatory response at cochlear places related to the DP frequencies. We measured responses of 91 inferior colliculus (IC) neurons in the gerbil during two-tone stimulation with frequencies well above the unit's receptive field but adequate to generate a distinct distortion product (f2-1 or 2f1-f2) at the unit's characteristic frequency (CF). Neuronal responses to DPs could be accounted for by the simultaneously measured DPOAEs for DP frequencies above 1.3 kHz. For DP frequencies below 1.3 kHz (n = 25) there was a discrepancy between intracochlear DP magnitude and DPOAE level and most neurons responded as if the intracochlear DP level was significantly higher than the DPOAE level in the ear channel. In 12 % of those low frequency neurons, responses to the DPs could be elicited even if the stimulus tone levels were below the threshold level of the neuron at CF. High intracochlear f1-f2 and 2f1-f2 DP-levels were verified by cancellation of the neuronal DP-response with a third phase-adjusted tone stimulus at the DP frequency. A frequency-specific reduction of middle ear gain at low frequencies is possibly involved in the reduction of DPOAE level. The results indicate that pitch-related properties of complex stimuli may be produced partially by high intracochlear f2-f1 distortion levels.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.