JN AJP citation statistics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (October 1, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.90833.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/6/3445    most recent
90833.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Shenoy, K. V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Shenoy, K. V
Submitted on July 30, 2008
Revised on September 18, 2008
Accepted on September 19, 2008

Toward Optimal Target Placement for Neural Prosthetic Devices

John Patrick Cunningham1*, Byron M. Yu1, Vikash Gilja1, Stephen I Ryu1, and Krishna V Shenoy1

1 Stanford University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jcunnin{at}stanford.edu.

Neural prosthetic systems have been designed to estimate continuous reach trajectories (motor prostheses) and to predict discrete reach targets (communication prostheses). In the latter case, reach targets are typically decoded from neural spiking activity during an instructed delay period, before the reach begins. Such systems use targets placed in radially symmetric geometries, independent of the tuning properties of the neurons available. Here we seek to automate the target placement process and increase decode accuracy in communication prostheses by selecting target locations based on the neural population at hand. Motor prostheses that incorporate intended target information could also benefit from this consideration. We present an optimal target placement algorithm that approximately maximizes decode accuracy with respect to target locations. In simulated neural spiking data fit from two monkeys, the optimal target placement algorithm yielded statistically significant improvements up to 8 and 9% for two and sixteen targets, respectively. For four and eight targets, gains were more modest, as the target layouts found by the algorithm closely resembled the canonical layouts. We trained a monkey in this paradigm and tested the algorithm with experimental neural data to confirm some of the results found in simulation. In all, the algorithm can serve not only to create new target layouts that outperform canonical layouts, but it can also confirm or help select among multiple canonical layouts. The optimal target placement algorithm developed here is the first algorithm of its kind, and it should both improve decode accuracy and help automate target placement for neural prostheses.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. Santhanam, B. M. Yu, V. Gilja, S. I. Ryu, A. Afshar, M. Sahani, and K. V. Shenoy
Factor-Analysis Methods for Higher-Performance Neural Prostheses
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 1315 - 1330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.