JN AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (February 18, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.90898.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/5/2263    most recent
90898.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Rugy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Carson, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Rugy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Carson, R. G.
Submitted on August 10, 2008
Revised on February 9, 2009
Accepted on February 16, 2009

The synergistic organization of muscle recruitment constrains visuomotor adaptation

Aymar de Rugy1*, Mark R Hinder2, Daniel G Woolley3, and Richard G. Carson4

1 The University of Queensland
2 University of Tasmania
3 K.U. Leuven
4 Queen's University Belfast

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: aymar{at}hms.uq.edu.au.

Reaching to visual targets engages the nervous system in a series of transformations between sensory information and motor commands. That which remains to be determined is the extent to which the processes that mediate sensorimotor adaptation to novel environments engage neural circuits that represent the required movement in joint-based or muscle-based coordinate systems. We sought to establish the contribution of these alternative representations to the process of visuomotor adaptation. To do so we applied a visuomotor rotation during a centre-out isometric torque production task that involved flexion/extension and supination/pronation at the elbow-joint complex. In separate sessions, distinct half quadrant rotations (i.e., 45 deg) were applied such that adaptation could be achieved either by only rescaling the individual joint-torques (i.e. the visual target and torque target remained in the same quadrant), or by additionally requiring torque-reversal at a contributing joint (i.e. the visual target and torque target were in different quadrants). Analysis of the time course of directional errors revealed that the degree of adaptation was lower (by approximately 20%) when reversals in the direction of joint-torques were required. It has been established previously that in this task space, a transition between supination and pronation requires the engagement of a different set of muscle synergists, whereas in a transition between flexion and extension no such change is required. The additional observation that the initial level of adaptation was lower, and the subsequent aftereffects were smaller, for trials that involved a pronation-supination transition than for those that involved a flexion-extension transition, supports the conclusion that the process of adaptation engaged, at least in part, neural circuits that represent the required motor output in a muscle-based coordinate system.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.